Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've had some fun with the canvassers tying to teach me the political landscape here.


"we're the republican party" - oh cool, which ones are the monarchists then?

"we're for a strong ireland" - really? I was hoping to vote for the party seeking to undermine it.


I'm none the wiser as far as differentiating the parties goes, but apparently having functioning sperm/womb and affiliation to the GAA are the sole requirements for local office, weirdly.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44534-whos-voting/#findComment-748461
Share on other sites

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've had some fun with the canvassers tying to

> teach me the political landscape here.

>

> "we're the republican party" - oh cool, which ones

> are the monarchists then?

> "we're for a strong ireland" - really? I was

> hoping to vote for the party seeking to undermine

> it.

>

> I'm none the wiser as far as differentiating the

> parties goes, but apparently having functioning

> sperm/womb and affiliation to the GAA are the sole

> requirements for local office, weirdly.


These are the lads for you...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%ADs_Nua

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44534-whos-voting/#findComment-748503
Share on other sites

i do find it a bit weird the insistence that a party name has to be gaelic, given the inability of the vast majority to speak more than about three words.


If there was a cultural imposition that x in the UK had to be done in old saxon for political show, I'd find that probably a bit disturbing. Not sure why noone finds it so here*.


*mostly because they don't care for the most part, but then apathy in the face of political malaise is hardly unique to the republic!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44534-whos-voting/#findComment-748518
Share on other sites

Yes the voting is insecure- last time there were cases of people turning up at the polling station and giving their names and addresses and finding that people had already used their ballot papers! Dipping your finger in indelible ink is a good idea- and a sign that you have actually voted- which we all should do of course- even though most politicians are self-serving, vote-chasing imbeciles!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44534-whos-voting/#findComment-748593
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...