Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jimbob Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> who cares dr.who is crap, its up there with donnie

> darko and withnail and i at the top of my scale of

> crapness.



Not seen Donnie Darko, but based on your other comments, I imagine I'll think it's shite too! Do you like The Pixies? ;-)

Ahem... OK... Donnie Darko is not crap. Check out the movie website, look at the DVD extras, then watch it again. There's more to it than meets the eye. If you make the effort, it will reward you.


Or don't bother, and watch something starring Tom Hanks instead.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jimbob Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > who cares dr.who is crap, its up there with

> donnie

> > darko and withnail and i at the top of my scale

> of

> > crapness.

>

>

> Not seen Donnie Darko, but based on your other

> comments, I imagine I'll think it's shite too! Do

> you like The Pixies? ;-)



nah they,re crap

how about a double twist to the plot - Catherine Tate - Who played Donna, as she became the 'Doctor-Donna' in the last episode, what's to stop him regenerating into an identical version of her as they sort of merged minds already...


Could be interesting and a strange turn of events... but then again I think it should finally end up that the Doctor transforms into Davros, goes back in time and becomes his own mortal enemy.... stranger things have happened you know !!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...