Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just so I am not seen to victimise a growing number of you in East Dulwich, this thread is purely for some lighted hearted anecdotes. And it should equally apply to yummy daddies before I am acused of being misogynist


So number 1 - lady is with her young child in a shop on North Cross Road, and suddenly announces that Tarquin wants a pee pee and brings out a potty. She was politely asked to take the child into the street.


(Having had to hold my two year old whilst she wee'd on on the gutter/verge without weeing on her or my feet that amused me).


Today in Finches (South Dulwich) a young child starts to turn a display carousel. Oh do be careful, says yummy daddy, and mummy replied with something similar acknowledging that this was very advanced/precocious and we should all be impressed. I commented later that the store keeper should have just thrown them all out. More funny in real life than it is on paper.

LadyNorwood Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Where on earth is South Dulwich???


Well, considering North Dulwich is south-west of East Dulwich, and West Dulwich is directly south of North Dulwich, I'd put South Dulwich somewhere near Leeds.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just so I am not seen to victimise a growing

> number of you in East Dulwich,


Always the same strange deliberate alienating approach from mal - "You, You people, You lot" etc. Are we to take it you are from another planet?

Well I've just looked up Finches - it's in Forest Hill, south Dulwich pah!!


Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LadyNorwood Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Where on earth is South Dulwich???

>

> Well, considering North Dulwich is south-west of

> East Dulwich, and West Dulwich is directly south

> of North Dulwich, I'd put South Dulwich somewhere

> near Leeds.

According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yummy_mummy "Yummy mummy is a slang term used in the United Kingdom to describe young, attractive and wealthy mothers"


Made me chuckle especially "The stereotypical yummy mummy was described by Nirpal Dhaliwal in The Times as having an existence "bankrolled by a husband working himself to death in the City, [dressing] in designer outfits... carries the latest must-have bag [and] whose hair and nails are perfectly groomed". A yummy mummy would have several children and yet remain a "girl-about-town", dressing fashionably and appearing well-groomed and carefree"


Can we really use this particular definition to the ED lovelies? I've never seen much "fashion" or appearance of "well grooming" around here! (yes yes I know they have kids, what else would one expect blah blah blah)

Oh my gawd, if you can't laugh about yourself then who can you laugh about.


By all means change the stereotype to fairly well educated parents and fairly affluent with young children who are recent arrivals to SE London - attracted by house prices and a growing bohemian atmosphere.


The one thing that unites them is they can't say no to their kids, and praise was may have been seen once as disruptive behaviour, now considered creative.


By all means argue that this is much better than walloping the kid or locking them in the chokey.


Ohh I am so sorry that I did not sleep on my post, re-read it and then take out anything that could possibly be seen as offensive. I was just amused by the behaviour of the family in Finches in South Dulwich (at least I enjoyed the debate on where South Dulwich is). And yummy mummy is a term we use for the change in recent demographics here up the hill in South Dulwich, SE Dulwich, Dulwich on the Hill, Duwich Horniman Park, Dulwich cum Beckenham, SS Dulwich, Dulwich Penge High Street etc.


When I moved to the area East Dulwich was rough as F, Lordship Lane was known as Hardship Lane, it kicked off outside pubs in a Saturday night and you couldn't find quince, focaccia or organic craft ale for love nor money. Although on the latter I preferred it that way. And the Dulwich Ripples have been spreading for years.


So rather than stay up your own backside, any amusing stories about parents indulging their young children?


My starter for ten is when my son was playing with a sachet of mayonaise at a ski hut (now there is YM for you) when it burst open and ejaculated all over someones ski jacket on a chair behind. We didn't praise him, just pretended it hadn't happened as the owner had his back to us, and there wasn't much you can do beyond offer to pay for the dry cleaning. Or run.

When was LL known as Hardship Lane? I've lived here nearly 30 years. Admittedly I've never felt like a local but that was me and not the locality. I was looking for peace so those things you mentioned you were looking for I wouldn't have even understood. Still don't really.

I must say I do find it bizarre the way so many mummies and daddies seem to find it ok to let their kids run up and down in busy local cafes where waiting staff are walking up and down with hot drinks, plates of food etc, and then they get all freaked out when their child inevitably bashes into something or falls over and starts wailing.

When i was a kid my parents would never have let me run around and shriek in a cafe.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My word you lot are so precious. The one great

> thing about 'alternative comedy' (if I can give it

> a name) was being able to laugh at yourself.

> Clearly East Dulwich has a problem here.


Given your fondness, in the pronoun camp, for the second person (plural) I'm surprised you are surprised by the lack of applause, chortling and back-slapping accompanied by posts of the "well said malumbu" variety.

hang on, let me get this straight, you are having a moan about parents who don't tell their children off yet your child burst a sachet of mayo over someone's jacket and you turned a blind eye?


added to that is the fact the original anecdote wasn't remotely funny, the name 'Targuin' has been so widely over-used its tiring in the extreme AND you can pretty much guarantee anything that starts off with 'give us your light-hearted stories about yummy mummies (a derogatory term)' is bound to be rubbish.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
    • I used Aria recently to replace the basin waste for my bathroom sink. He was super friendly, communicative and helpful - including changing the washer on the new replacement I bought to ensure longevity. Would highly recommend. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...