Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah, the poor Italian guy will be out for months.

>

>

> Oh wait, no he won't.

>

> Perspective please. It's very weird but he hasn't

> shot someone.


No he hasn't but come on, how many more times do we have to witness his fcuk witted behaviour. That's two bites, the Evra thing, and the deliberate handball in 2010 world cup. He is a nasty little fcuker and there's only so much lattitude you can give anyone individual.

Just for the record, I've not excused his behaviour anywhere. On Facebook I immediately posted saying he's clearly got something wrong with his head.


But equally I think people are getting a bit carried away.


He's made an absolute fool of himself AGAIN, and on the world stage. He's probably screwed his chances of a great move to Real or somewhere. He'll no doubt receive a pretty hefty punishment, but all this "ban him for a season or for life" talk is stupid.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just for the record, I've not excused his

> behaviour anywhere. On Facebook I immediately

> posted saying he's clearly got something wrong

> with his head.

>

> But equally I think people are getting a bit

> carried away.

>

> He's made an absolute fool of himself AGAIN, and

> on the world stage. He's probably screwed his

> chances of a great move to Real or somewhere.

> He'll no doubt receive a pretty hefty punishment,

> but all this "ban him for a season or for life"

> talk is stupid.


The question is what to do with such a guy, clearly bans don't work.

I agree with Otta on this one. He's obviously a bit nutso and should be banned but I think spitting at another player is worse and there have been pundits on our screens who are no strangers to that charming habit (giving and receiving).


He didn't break the skin so it's no more painful than those through-the-shirt-nipple-tweaks we've seen players give opponents when they "help them to their feet" - it is just bizarre and dumb and pointless and a bit feral.


Still - anything to distract folk from the woeful showing of England again - good job Costa Rice were taking it easy.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What about headbutts? And I don't mean clashes

> going for the ball, I mean the Alan Pardew school

> of putting your head in someone's face.


First things first. I totally disagree with maxxi, and why he's mentioned Englands showing at the WC in this context is beyond me. Nor do I understand the comparing what pundits have done in the past to his behaviour. Regardless of their behaviour, Suarez is out of order. Put whtaever others have doen to one side for the moment, we are discussing Suarez here. Not what pundits may or may not have done in their careers, that's a seperate discussion. Oh and Pardew "there's too many foreigners in the league" was/is and always will be a fcuk wit.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Make up your mind. It's not so bad because it

> didn't break skin, but spitting is worse?

>


Okay look, they're both 'orrible but wouldn't you honestly rather have someone bite your shoulder through a shirt without drawing blood than have them gob on you?

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> First things first. I totally disagree with maxxi,

> and why he's mentioned Englands showing at the WC

> in this context is beyond me.


Because headline writers can enjoy demonising the man who knocked England out and now it's all that's being talked about - I bet England are glad it happened.


> Nor do I understand

> the comparing what pundits have done in the past

> to his behaviour.


Because their inclusion on tv as respected pundits shows that things that are deemed unforgiveable now will BE forgiven in the future.


A 6 match international ban and a fine and possibly some counselling and let's move on.

Well Maxxi said Suarwzw is obviously a bit nutso and deserves to be banned. I agree.


But surely it's okay to compare one misdemeanour to another?


Alan "stomp on a player but get away with it because you're England captain" Shearer is the worst for being holier than thou.


In their defence, what do you say about this guy who has biten on three separate occasions? It's outside of the norm so they say "it's a disgrace" because saying "maybe he needs some professional help" is outside of their remit.


Yes I'm a Liverpool fan and yes I hope he's either available for us or we get some dosh for him, but that is not what I'm basing my opinion of here.


And genuine question here, when a player has done something really bad during international duty, have they been banned at domestic level? Honest question because I can't remember.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> StraferJack Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Make up your mind. It's not so bad because it

> > didn't break skin, but spitting is worse?

> >

>

> Okay look, they're both 'orrible but wouldn't you

> honestly rather have someone bite your shoulder

> through a shirt without drawing blood than have

> them gob on you?



Having had a little scrote spit in my face a couple of years back, I'd honestly take the bite every time.


If bitten like the player was tonight I'd have probably responded like that player. If someone spat in my face I'd jave struggled not to punch them right in the face.

From BBC website


"The longest ban in World Cup history was eight games for Italy's Mauro Tassotti for breaking Spain's Luis Enrique's nose in 1994 with an elbow, while Zinedine Zidane was given a three-match ban for headbutting Marco Materazzi in the 2006 final."




So in that context (the real one) what ban should Suarez get?

Once again. It's nothing to do with the amount of damage done physically


But you don't want people going around biting or spitting in the game. Plus repeat offender (with all the contrition that went with it)


Your kids will probably do worse things than bite people but you wouldn't shrug it off either


And it has nothing to do with him playing in England. God but Liverpool supporters can be chippy sometimes

If my kids do something wrong they get an explanation as to why its wrong.

If they do it again, they get told off.

If they do it again they get punished.


If they do it obsessively they should probably get a doctor, but I'd avoid activities which encourage it until we get some sort of clean bill of health.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...