Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know we've moved on but in light of the non-decision from FIFA (no way!?) I suspect a further delay then an appeal by the Uruguayans that will mean Suarez can play until Uruguay are knocked out then a small ban (meaning he'll miss a few unimportant games) and poor Luis saying he needs a multi-multi-million pound transfer as the incident has meant he will be persecuted in England.


Job done.

I do wonder whether they're looking for better footage, because none that I have seen would be conclusive. Don't get me wrong, we all know what happened, but if he says "proove it" then they need a shot from the opposite side of all the ones I've seen, showing him actually getting his teeth stuck in.


I suspect you're right that he'll say he can't possibly carry on in England now, and I hope Liverpool get a bloody good fee for him! ...



...



... and don't use it like Spurs used their Bale money!

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do wonder whether they're looking for better

> footage, because none that I have seen would be

> conclusive. Don't get me wrong, we all know what

> happened, but if he says "proove it" then they

> need a shot from the opposite side of all the ones

> I've seen, showing him actually getting his teeth

> stuck in.

>


I think the pics of the guys shoulder with the puncture marks are helpful to the evidence against LS.

So his country who were responsible for him at the time, lose him for one match (they won't get pst their next match I don't think), and Liverpool lose him until the end of October.


If I say that seems a bit unfair to me am I playing the victim?


Just to be veeeeeery clear for SJ & Co, I don't think FIFA have done this to pick on Liverpool FC. But I think that they have failed to consider his club who managed to manage him well all last season, whilst barely punishing his country who have not only supported him (like LFC did) but have actively tried to lie his way out of it.


Long international ban would have been fairer IMO. And not that anyone of you will believe me, but I'd say that if it wasn't a Liverpool player to.


This is the first time they've banned from all footy for something other than drugs. It sets a precedent.

I think Liverpool fans should focus their ire in Suarez


After the second bite and 10 match ban and all the support from the club there must have been awareness that another incident wouldn't just be another 10 match ban.


He's the culprit in all of this. FIFA had to act so quickly to remove any ambiguity when Uruguay still in middle of World Cup.


Club. Country. Doesn't matter to him. He could do the same anywhere now as he has proven.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Liverpool fans should focus their ire in Suarez


I basically agree with that. Although I still think that this is not as serious as some other stuff that goes on... nevertheless he brought it on himself.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So his country who were responsible for him at the

> time, lose him for one match (they won't get pst

> their next match I don't think), and Liverpool

> lose him until the end of October.


As I read it, he's also suspended for nine international matches, so Uruguay will lose him for quite a while. Nowhere near long enough ? he should have been banned from all football for a year and made to accept treatment for his 'issues'. But then I guess the lawyers would be all over it like vultures.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Liverpool fans should focus their ire in

> Suarez



Do you honestly think any Liverpool fan is not angry at him and doesn't think he's a complete tool?



> Club. Country. Doesn't matter to him. He could do

> the same anywhere now as he has proven.



You're probably right, it makes no difference to him.


BUT


This is my issue


When banned for Liverpool for something he did in a Liverpool shirt, he was free to represent his country. Why should Liverpool suffer for something he did on international duty? That is not me playing victim Liverpool, that is me thinking this seems genuinely unfair.

Liverpool ban was second offence


This time is third offence


Not hard to see the thinking behind it


Anyway instead of asking why he is banned from club duty, ask why the club don't ban him anyway. Honestly if he was an arsenal Player I would be embarrassed and would want Wenger to just get rid. I wouldn't want him wearing arsenal colours again

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But what are you basing that judgement on? Vibes? where exactly and under what council is money being spent wisely? what about parties which promise to cut waste, come to power and find out there is no waste?   
    • I've just had James from Trelco round doing taps and hot water.  Prompt, efficient and pleasant people and the cost came in under what we thought it would be! Will definitely use them again.
    • Yes - adult care is a large part of the CT bill.  That does not mean the council spend our money well or wisely.        
    • “What do councils spend all the money on?” Is, in my view, one of the most profoundly emblematic of our times  we go about our lives, backed up by councils and governments and complain they aren’t needed  reform win elections based on “we’re gonna go in and slash all the waste!” Only to later admit there effectively isn’t any oh and by the way we need to increase council tax   Now all we have to offer is racism and ineptitude sorry about that  https://www.gbnews.com/money/reform-elon-musk-doge-failed-savings So where does the money go? On a multitude of services - but the increasingly aged population and the care provision required is a large part of it  the government could give councils more money to avoid council tax rises  - but the we would have to pay more in jewels taxation  and as a country we tend to pay less than other similar countries  so we end up with an expensive mend and make do approach  I don’t see any political parties offering a solution   Starmer is obviously lacking in many areas but he is the result of a hostile media and a reluctant population willing to hear truths  (wait until we hear how much we will need to increase defence spending by in the coming years) If a party stopped pretending all the money was wasted but published a list of costs, projections and proposals that wasn’t gutted to suit the landscape of needing to not bemonstered by the press or deemed too expensive by voters I would be very interested      can’t see that happening tho  (also worth reminding ourselves of all the brexiters who said things like “I don’t care how much it costs   I don’t care if I lose my job  it’s about taking back control!” And yet now we find them complaining about increasing costs. As they always will complain about everything  because it’s always someone else’s fault)   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...