Jump to content

The 2014 World Cup thread

????

By ????
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

I know we've moved on but in light of the non-decision from FIFA (no way!?) I suspect a further delay then an appeal by the Uruguayans that will mean Suarez can play until Uruguay are knocked out then a small ban (meaning he'll miss a few unimportant games) and poor Luis saying he needs a multi-multi-million pound transfer as the incident has meant he will be persecuted in England.


Job done.

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

I do wonder whether they're looking for better footage, because none that I have seen would be conclusive. Don't get me wrong, we all know what happened, but if he says "proove it" then they need a shot from the opposite side of all the ones I've seen, showing him actually getting his teeth stuck in.


I suspect you're right that he'll say he can't possibly carry on in England now, and I hope Liverpool get a bloody good fee for him! ...



...



... and don't use it like Spurs used their Bale money!

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do wonder whether they're looking for better

> footage, because none that I have seen would be

> conclusive. Don't get me wrong, we all know what

> happened, but if he says "proove it" then they

> need a shot from the opposite side of all the ones

> I've seen, showing him actually getting his teeth

> stuck in.

>


I think the pics of the guys shoulder with the puncture marks are helpful to the evidence against LS.

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

So his country who were responsible for him at the time, lose him for one match (they won't get pst their next match I don't think), and Liverpool lose him until the end of October.


If I say that seems a bit unfair to me am I playing the victim?


Just to be veeeeeery clear for SJ & Co, I don't think FIFA have done this to pick on Liverpool FC. But I think that they have failed to consider his club who managed to manage him well all last season, whilst barely punishing his country who have not only supported him (like LFC did) but have actively tried to lie his way out of it.


Long international ban would have been fairer IMO. And not that anyone of you will believe me, but I'd say that if it wasn't a Liverpool player to.


This is the first time they've banned from all footy for something other than drugs. It sets a precedent.

StraferJack

StraferJack

Posted
Posted

I think Liverpool fans should focus their ire in Suarez


After the second bite and 10 match ban and all the support from the club there must have been awareness that another incident wouldn't just be another 10 match ban.


He's the culprit in all of this. FIFA had to act so quickly to remove any ambiguity when Uruguay still in middle of World Cup.


Club. Country. Doesn't matter to him. He could do the same anywhere now as he has proven.

Jeremy

Jeremy

Posted
Posted

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Liverpool fans should focus their ire in Suarez


I basically agree with that. Although I still think that this is not as serious as some other stuff that goes on... nevertheless he brought it on himself.

BrandNewGuy

BrandNewGuy

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So his country who were responsible for him at the

> time, lose him for one match (they won't get pst

> their next match I don't think), and Liverpool

> lose him until the end of October.


As I read it, he's also suspended for nine international matches, so Uruguay will lose him for quite a while. Nowhere near long enough ? he should have been banned from all football for a year and made to accept treatment for his 'issues'. But then I guess the lawyers would be all over it like vultures.

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Liverpool fans should focus their ire in

> Suarez



Do you honestly think any Liverpool fan is not angry at him and doesn't think he's a complete tool?



> Club. Country. Doesn't matter to him. He could do

> the same anywhere now as he has proven.



You're probably right, it makes no difference to him.


BUT


This is my issue


When banned for Liverpool for something he did in a Liverpool shirt, he was free to represent his country. Why should Liverpool suffer for something he did on international duty? That is not me playing victim Liverpool, that is me thinking this seems genuinely unfair.

StraferJack

StraferJack

Posted
Posted

Liverpool ban was second offence


This time is third offence


Not hard to see the thinking behind it


Anyway instead of asking why he is banned from club duty, ask why the club don't ban him anyway. Honestly if he was an arsenal Player I would be embarrassed and would want Wenger to just get rid. I wouldn't want him wearing arsenal colours again

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • march46
      Application for Londis Off-Licence next to Charter East Entrance

      By march46 · Posted

      Big Bellies didn’t have permission.  
    • CP_ED
      Application for Londis Off-Licence next to Charter East Entrance

      By CP_ED · Posted

      Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • teddyboy23
      New Empanada Place on LL

      By teddyboy23 · Posted

      The lady is called Janet 
    • FellbriggSam
      Tree Killer – Seeking Advice on Dealing with Toxic Neighbours

      By FellbriggSam · Posted

      He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...