Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I want them to get rid, but that has just become a lot harder.


Do you people really think football is still an honourable gents game?


It's a nasty corrupt money fuelled entertainment industry. Why the hell would YOU be embarrassed? Like they care about you the little individual.


And you haven't remotely answered my issue with this by saying this is a third offence. It was not his third offence in a Liverpool shirt. His club paid for that offence, and he could still represent his country. Is it so hard to see why that is a bit shit on his club?


I have never claimed he is anything other than a mentalist. I just want the team I support to have the best chance they can next season, and that means he's available to play or be sold. We can sell, but only for a cut price now.

Being a football fan is weird. We do know it's many of the things you say


But there are small pockets left of "the right thing"


Wenger offering sheffield utd a replay when kanu and over mars combined to score is the first example that popped into my head


Fowler telling a ref it wasn't a penalty

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wenger offering sheffield utd a replay when kanu

> and over mars combined to score is the first

> example that popped into my head

>

> Fowler telling a ref it wasn't a penalty



Both a loooooooooong time ago in football terms. Can you imagine a striker these days actually telling a ref it wasn't a penalty? Most of them are going to ground trying to win a penalty.


I'd love to see stuff like that, but can't imagine it at top level these days.

I know Suarez and the biting thing is "out there" and inexcusable, but what has basically bugged me the last couple of days is comments like "cheating scum" because when it comes to actual cheating, he's no worse than a ton of other players in the PL and all over the world.


Once again, the worst thing he has ever done for me is the hand ball in the last WC. Blatant cheat, and a pretty clever / cynical thing to do.


The biting is just bizarre, but at the end of the day, it didn't cost Italy anything the other night, they just lost.

I think FIFA have got it right. None of this is about Liverpool, or Uraguay per se. It's about the conduct of one man, Suarez, and the punishment has to be directed at him. If Liverpool are the club unlucky enough to have him on their books, then tough. Suarez is a liability when he behaves like that. FIFA are right to make everyone connected with him, realise the cost of that liability. Perhaps if he can't get employment because of his actions, it might just make the thug understand he isn't above the law. If he had done that on a street corner after a night out, he'd be up on an ABH charge and common assualt.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good decision and about time more bans like this

> were made to preserve some integrity in football.



Next due up - Sepp Blatter himself. He's put himself up for relection again - corrupt, deluded and vain, most of him reminds me of Zimbabwe's Mugabe.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Being a football fan is weird. We do know it's

> many of the things you say

>

> But there are small pockets left of "the right

> thing"

>

> Wenger offering sheffield utd a replay when kanu

> and over mars combined to score is the first

> example that popped into my head

>

> Fowler telling a ref it wasn't a penalty



Di Canio's 'catch'

Last word I'll say on this.


I think this ban will be an inconvenience to Suarez, he'll lose his chance to be the big star at this WC. In the long run his clever PR Team will probably make it work for him somehow.


For me Liverpool FC are the biggest losers as a result of it, and yes I feel they have been harshly punished for something completely out of their control after having kept him grounded for the season.


But I'll never convince most of you so fuck it.


Agree about Blatter MrBen.

Liverpool have gambled on Suarez and lost


They knew he did this before more than once and stuck by him


They knew he angled to get away last season and stuck by him


He was a big racist and they stuck by him


And with him they have won nothing. Liverpool fc hoped they would benefit from his skills. They haven't. Now they can choose to stick by him or let some other suckers deal with him


But as a club they are bigger than any single player and should be planning accordingly

He is a persistent cheat and people know that, hence the jubilation that there's some sort of comeuppance.

Plenty of others in the game I'm sure people would feel equally pleased about, no one's claiming he's unique.


Irony of course is that biting isn't actually cheating (though his feigned reaction was) , just plain wrong.

Wow. The holier than thou attitude on here is brilliant.


And as for "He's a big racist" should have added "fat" for extra impact there.


Suarez is a nob and has been punished. I'll wait for the next 4-5 pages of outrage when another player does something controversial. Neymar's elbow last night? No comment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...