Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well it would seem bloggy types are less than enthused


I guess it all still boils down to moderation policies. The sort of people willing to dish out death threats online aren't far removed from the idiots who threaten world cup referees and the like.

They're not put off doing so by the law so a pretty picture in the corner won't stop them.


That said, categorising a blog or forum so people can easily see where a site lies in the death threat - slanging match - polite - dull spectrum isn't such a bad idea.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/450-content-warnings/#findComment-9713
Share on other sites

Interesting but this forum isn't a blog, is slightly moderated, there's not a "anything goes" policy and anonymous comments aren't allowed. I agree that people should take responsibility for their words and having looked at the draft I think this site adheres to most of what's written.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/450-content-warnings/#findComment-9714
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The stop outside the chippy was still closed earlier today, although the barriers I saw yesterday have been removed, so no need for the closure.  The stop outside the church across the road is now uncovered and open
    • You all have different and conflicting interests though. It isn't necessarily appropriate for him to communicate with all of you at the same time about the same issues.    You're giving more away with each post as to how these difficulties probably arose. 
    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...