Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think strictly speaking that applies to criminal procedures.

With no charges having been made arseholes of the world unite in coming up with any old rubbish conspiracy theory and presumption of guilt, and papers can come up with any old crap to sell their filthy rags.


That's how our injudicious [social] media works.

I'm not posting again (after this post) or entering into any discussion on this thread unless or until someone/some people are charged, having learned my lesson in the past and not wishing to be verbally attacked again and accused of being sick and in need of psychiatric help :(


However I will say three things.


1. You can read (translations of) the original Portuguese police files here, which are hard facts without media distortion, spinning and opinion:


http://themaddiecasefiles.com/forum3.html?sid=5969424745f82f38a41b5c7eee000e22


2. It is interesting that the current investigation is again using cadaver dogs - the dogs which Mr McCann said were "notoriously unreliable" after two British dogs in 2007 alerted to many places and items associated with the McCanns, and alerted nowhere else (and the dogs who some people on this forum also dissed).


3. It is interesting that the current digging is taking place very near the area where the Smith family saw a man resembling Mr McCann carrying a child on the night of Madeleine's disappearance, and which sighting according to Crimewatch the Met are now apparently treating as very significant, having discounted the "abductor" which Jane Tanner "saw" near the McCanns' apartment on the same night.


I remember that I was again pulled to pieces on the previous thread on here for bringing up this Smith sighting - which the Portuguese police had also considered very significant.


And now, although it is going to be extremely hard for me - having followed the case for the past seven years - I am not going to look at this thread again.


I shall continue to discuss developments on other forums, where my views based on information in the public domain which does not come from media reports are not considered "sick". I fully accept that there is an enormous amount of information which has not been made public which could completely change my present views if I knew it.


Let us hope that finally justice is done in this case, whoever or whatever turns out to have been responsible for the death of a three year old child.

What ever happened to that poor wee girl may never be known.

What really pi**es me off is how easy a ride the fu*king McCann's have got for their role in the disappearance of their daughter.

If they had not been so selfish in wanting to go out on the lash and leave three children alone in a foreign country for numerous nights, none of this would ever have happened.

IMO they should have been charged with child neglect.

I despise that pair, even more so for never really acknowleding what they did was hideous and was the single factor that meant she disappeared.

God I hate the ugly side of the forum


Even cackling at them from the sidelines for being middle-class and white is bad enough


But to accuse someone who is going to spend rest of their lives haunted what happened that night of doing it themselves, and travelling the world as a holiday, on someone elses dime?


Some people need to take a good hard look at themselves

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> God I hate the ugly side of the forum

>

> Even cackling at them from the sidelines for being

> middle-class and white is bad enough

>

> But to accuse someone who is going to spend rest

> of their lives haunted what happened that night of

> doing it themselves, and travelling the world as a

> holiday, on someone elses dime?

>

> Some people need to take a good hard look at

> themselves



"Like"

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> God I hate the ugly side of the forum

>

> Even cackling at them from the sidelines for being

> middle-class and white is bad enough

>

> But to accuse someone who is going to spend rest

> of their lives haunted what happened that night of

> doing it themselves, and travelling the world as a

> holiday, on someone elses dime?

>

> Some people need to take a good hard look at

> themselves



I basically agree with everything you say here.


But


I did find myself just not liking them from the off. And I know that's bad of me, but I just found them instantly unlikable.


But totally agree that any crime they commited that night in leaving their kids alone has been more than paid for, and will continue to be paid for (well over the odds) for the rest of their lives.

Their mistake was not to do enough crying on camera for a long enough period - to sate the public appetite. Like that Joanne Lees woman in Australia. If only she'd have cried a bit more people might have been a bit more sympathetic. As it was, she only had herself to blame for the way everyone turned on her.


Personally, I expect a continuous stream of bereaved tears to be funnelled into a bowl - set at my feet - for a period of at least one year. Anything else is a clear indication of guilt.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As a diminutive (5ft 1) woman who regularly attends the park with her four children - all under 5; two of them (twins) in a push-chair - the thread caught my eye. If there identifiable troublemakers likely to be there I want to know what they look like so I can avoid them. Isn't that "strange" of me, wishing to avoid harm coming to my children?? 😲 I have been discussing the ludicrous responses to this thread 🧵 (which I bet £100 exclusively emanate from bourgeois native Brits) with work colleagues (you would be hard pressed to find a more 'diverse' bunch in terms of age and ethnicity - except we are all female). One colleague (a Ukranian lady) made a perceptive observation that everyone seemed to agree with. When British newspapers and news websites mention an offender (e.g. 'police are asking the general public for assistance in seeking the alleged offender who is a middle-aged male'), she always assumes the offender is not of white British heritage since, if the offender is white this is usually mentioned, but seldom the other way around. Until recently racial prejudice was a thing of the past (unless in the most hardcore of families), now it is creeping back and one important factor is the perception that the indigenous general public are not being treated fairly with this sort of dishonest - some would say activist - reportage. An attitude that clearly informed the bizarre claim that my concerned inquiry was  "strange". Fact is it was anything but strange. What is strange is people denying the evidence of their own eyes and - in this case - casting aspersions on a concerned parent. 
    • Yesterday we received about 3 weeks worth of post. This included duplicate documents where we'd had to ask for another copy since the first copy never arrived, bank papers, my new driving licence and one mis-delivery.  We'd spent ages in the last few weeks either on the phone or convoluted websites trying to chase these things. I'd rally like to co,plain but have a feeling I'd be wasting my time.
    • sad news one of the few shops offering good value
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...