Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think strictly speaking that applies to criminal procedures.

With no charges having been made arseholes of the world unite in coming up with any old rubbish conspiracy theory and presumption of guilt, and papers can come up with any old crap to sell their filthy rags.


That's how our injudicious [social] media works.

I'm not posting again (after this post) or entering into any discussion on this thread unless or until someone/some people are charged, having learned my lesson in the past and not wishing to be verbally attacked again and accused of being sick and in need of psychiatric help :(


However I will say three things.


1. You can read (translations of) the original Portuguese police files here, which are hard facts without media distortion, spinning and opinion:


http://themaddiecasefiles.com/forum3.html?sid=5969424745f82f38a41b5c7eee000e22


2. It is interesting that the current investigation is again using cadaver dogs - the dogs which Mr McCann said were "notoriously unreliable" after two British dogs in 2007 alerted to many places and items associated with the McCanns, and alerted nowhere else (and the dogs who some people on this forum also dissed).


3. It is interesting that the current digging is taking place very near the area where the Smith family saw a man resembling Mr McCann carrying a child on the night of Madeleine's disappearance, and which sighting according to Crimewatch the Met are now apparently treating as very significant, having discounted the "abductor" which Jane Tanner "saw" near the McCanns' apartment on the same night.


I remember that I was again pulled to pieces on the previous thread on here for bringing up this Smith sighting - which the Portuguese police had also considered very significant.


And now, although it is going to be extremely hard for me - having followed the case for the past seven years - I am not going to look at this thread again.


I shall continue to discuss developments on other forums, where my views based on information in the public domain which does not come from media reports are not considered "sick". I fully accept that there is an enormous amount of information which has not been made public which could completely change my present views if I knew it.


Let us hope that finally justice is done in this case, whoever or whatever turns out to have been responsible for the death of a three year old child.

What ever happened to that poor wee girl may never be known.

What really pi**es me off is how easy a ride the fu*king McCann's have got for their role in the disappearance of their daughter.

If they had not been so selfish in wanting to go out on the lash and leave three children alone in a foreign country for numerous nights, none of this would ever have happened.

IMO they should have been charged with child neglect.

I despise that pair, even more so for never really acknowleding what they did was hideous and was the single factor that meant she disappeared.

God I hate the ugly side of the forum


Even cackling at them from the sidelines for being middle-class and white is bad enough


But to accuse someone who is going to spend rest of their lives haunted what happened that night of doing it themselves, and travelling the world as a holiday, on someone elses dime?


Some people need to take a good hard look at themselves

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> God I hate the ugly side of the forum

>

> Even cackling at them from the sidelines for being

> middle-class and white is bad enough

>

> But to accuse someone who is going to spend rest

> of their lives haunted what happened that night of

> doing it themselves, and travelling the world as a

> holiday, on someone elses dime?

>

> Some people need to take a good hard look at

> themselves



"Like"

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> God I hate the ugly side of the forum

>

> Even cackling at them from the sidelines for being

> middle-class and white is bad enough

>

> But to accuse someone who is going to spend rest

> of their lives haunted what happened that night of

> doing it themselves, and travelling the world as a

> holiday, on someone elses dime?

>

> Some people need to take a good hard look at

> themselves



I basically agree with everything you say here.


But


I did find myself just not liking them from the off. And I know that's bad of me, but I just found them instantly unlikable.


But totally agree that any crime they commited that night in leaving their kids alone has been more than paid for, and will continue to be paid for (well over the odds) for the rest of their lives.

Their mistake was not to do enough crying on camera for a long enough period - to sate the public appetite. Like that Joanne Lees woman in Australia. If only she'd have cried a bit more people might have been a bit more sympathetic. As it was, she only had herself to blame for the way everyone turned on her.


Personally, I expect a continuous stream of bereaved tears to be funnelled into a bowl - set at my feet - for a period of at least one year. Anything else is a clear indication of guilt.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've never got Christmas pudding. The only times I've managed to make it vaguely acceptable to people is thus: Buy a really tiny one when it's remaindered in Tesco's. They confound carbon dating, so the yellow labelled stuff at 75% off on Boxing Day will keep you going for years. Chop it up and soak it in Stones Ginger Wine and left over Scotch. Mix it in with a decent vanilla ice cream. It's like a festive Rum 'n' Raisin. Or: Stick a couple in a demijohn of Aldi vodka and serve it to guests, accompanied by 'The Party's Over' by Johnny Mathis when people simply won't leave your flat.
    • Not miserable at all! I feel the same and also want to complain to the council but not sure who or where best to aim it at? I have flagged it with our local MP and one Southwark councillor previously but only verbally when discussing other things and didn’t get anywhere other than them agreeing it was very frustrating etc. but would love to do something on paper. I think they’ve been pretty much every night for the last couple of weeks and my cat is hating it! As am I !
    • That is also a Young's pub, like The Cherry Tree. However fantastic the menu looks, you might want to ask exactly who will cook the food on the day, and how. Also, if  there is Christmas pudding on the menu, you might want to ask how that will be cooked, and whether it will look and/or taste anything like the Christmas puddings you have had in the past.
    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...