Jump to content

Recommended Posts

oh no.... another of my famous typo/spelling errors


sexciting



that's what I meant!!!


Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "and you have some sexiting times later"

>

> Mmmm, surely sexiting is that last farewell @#$%&

> before you move onto pastures new?

There are Mikecg far too many in this society, and the law is making it so you can no longer speak the truth lest you be sued.

It smacks of 50s Russia when it heaved with secret police and no one dared to speak openly with their neighbours.


There should be a word for it..........gagging, no it's not precise enough we need a new word....

With thanks to the Daily Mash...


OED researcher Nathan Muir said: "The dictionary can accept neologisms if there are frequent enough references to its definition in common culture.


"Following a thorough appraisal we are now satisfied that 'ronaldo' has become sufficiently analogous with a lying, pig-eyed sack of donkey turds."


Other new definitions in the next edition include:


Clarkson: (adj) Where the truth of an opinion is inversely proportional to its popularity amongst the mentally ill. The assertion that cyclists are worse than Hitler is profoundly clarkson.


Bale: (n) A tantrum completely out of proportion to the perceived slight. On hearing the cafe had run out of cinnamon, Nikki threw a bale until someone smacked her with a teapot.


For example: "Half a dozen new posters did a Bale on the ED shooting thread whilst AFN, typically, did a Clarkson."

  • 1 month later...

Either MM or MP wrote about "Abrogating" your responsibilities.


One or two other recent words describing internet terms that I was not familiar with.


I invented one the other day which no-one could be assed to pick up on when I described a "Plexegon" of Primroses.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Saw this today about Southwark voting in support of a tourist tax in the borough  BBC News - Tourist tax visitor levy comes closer in Southwark https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5ypvw0qln7o Makes me wonder what else they can find to tax, maybe a fine for breaking wind, or breathing or even a tax on windows. Of course I am being facetious but it does feel like if it moves, they will tax it. 
    • Politicians particularly so....remember it's always party before people! I doubt McAsh will be in cabinet much longer...he might find even more attempts to kneecap his political career. I wonder if he might have to move to another area and restart - he obviously has political ambition but it seems Southwark is not going to be where it blossoms anymore - unless he can manage some sort of coup.  
    • You could attend the next edf drinks    https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/360548-ed-forum-drinks/page/3/#comments
    • Hi Sue, they were not local solicitors. Andrea’s was based in Wales and the other firms involved were large nationwide conveyancing companies (rather than conventional high street solicitors). I’m happy to advise clients and buyers privately on what I believe to be their shortcomings but I don’t think doing so in public on the forum would be appropriate, particularly as they are not locally based. My general advice would always be to steer clear of the big conveyancing companies as they are, in my experience, notoriously difficult to contact when the need arises and the case handler is often not a fully qualified solicitor and so issues have to be referred upwards to “technical teams” internally, which was part of the problem in Andrea’s chain. Tony
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...