Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I love the idea of a more local school run by a decent organisation but given that I live in SE15 I still will not be able to access the school for my children walking distance etc (just checked I live 17 minutes walking distance). Why is the site so close to Charter School? This has been an historic fiasco with the Charter School being championed by the very parents who couldn't get their children into it, as the main intake comes from the, 'wrong side' of Lordship Lane. Again we will witness this problem for the next generation of 30 something parents coming into the area most of whom can only afford to move into the SE15 postcode. Also given all the middle class snobbery that went with Charter and the scandal around the kids from DKH Estate not being allowed in even when they lived so close. What is to say that this social engineering is not again repeated here. What Southwark needs to do is make all schools accessible regardless of distance etc,(just as Kingsdale manages to do!) so that people can't create these social divides and in so doing mix the schools up class, colour etc. etc and see which education org wins and produces the best education for all kids.
17 minutes is not a prohibitive walking distance. Lots of parents I know walk for 20-25 mins to primary. It's also completely untrue to assert that admittance by distance will lead to lots of kids from wealthy middle class backgrounds to the exclusion of everyone else. There is a wide diversity of people of different backgrounds living near the Dulwich hospital site and as the crow flies admission is likely to include all of the DKH estate.
Of course 17 minutes isn't long but it will preclude anyone living that far i.e Bellenden Road area (so close and yet so far!!) to accessing it if 'closest to school', will be the main admissions criteria. I am sorry but I think you are either missing my point or have not been witness to the school issues locally over the last two decades; hence yet another new school. As for DKH kids, the crow did fly very close to Charter but they were denied access and it wasn't the appeals board or Southwark that stepped in to correct this problem. I wonder as the crow flies which school would be closer Charter or the new school ( I shall check.)as the DKH kids certainly missed out on the admissions policy for Charter. I suggest you look at class and race in schools in Peckham se15, that can easily service the middle classes but who shy away from them on the basis that they have a predominantly different ethnic mix and class make up to their own, lets not pretend!

Let's get some facts straight first. Charter as it currently stands operate a closest safe walking route not an as the crow flies admissions criteria. The issue about whether the children on the DKH estate could be admitted or not depended on whether a short cut through was included in the allowable walking routes or not. It seems that the new school may operate a crow flies criteria but I don't think this is decided (nor which provider would run the new school)


Charter serves a diverse community, not just the middle classes. It is diverse ethnically. Stand by the school gates at the start/end of school day and look for yourself. If you live in Bellenden you may not get into Charter now but depending on which end of Bellenden I would imagine you would have a good chance of getting into the secondary school on the Hospital site. Don't forget you also have Harris Peckham which is very close by and has an ofsted good rating.


As for following Kingsdale's model of the lottery system, with its popularity the chances of your child getting is equally small whereever you live! At least with a distance based system there is a certain amount of certainty which helps when planning ahead.

bornagain - I agree completely.


I don't understand why you would rather the (small) random chance of getting into your preferred choice via a lottery versus a more predicatable chance that as the crow flies admissions offers. At least you know where you stand, and so either accept the fact or (in theory) do something about it (for example, move).


Some people have mentioned they prefer a distance based admissions with banding - because they felt it would potentially increase the maximum distance for them? I don't really understand this - unless you know that there are fewer children in your childs particular band closer to the school than there are on average in the other bands? How could you possibly know this? Or is it just that with a smaller admissions group (if say 5 bands then 20% of intake) then there will be more variation from a statistical point of view. In which case this sounds like taking a big chance to me and going back to my first point is not something I could rely on (call me a control freak!).

Hi Chupa123,

The reason why this site - is because its the only local site that could house a secondary school.

Ideally we'd have found a site 1 mile to the SE but I've not found one.


Lottery admissions wouldnt result in a school serving the local area. It would see children coming so distance and not meet any travel plan that the planning process I would anticipate requiring.

Frankly, I'm amazed Kingsdale has been allowed to go to lottery admissions considering the travel impact.


But the good news is that whichever provider gets to open a new school - Haberdahsers' Aske's or The Charter it should see an overall far larger admissions footprint and I would expect it to stretch into SE15.

I think chupa has a point


"What Southwark needs to do is make all schools accessible regardless of distance etc,(just as Kingsdale manages to do!) so that people can't create these social divides and in so doing mix the schools up class, colour etc. etc and see which education org wins and produces the best education for all kids."


I know that Southwark now lacks the ability to influence admissions policies - not even sure that it still operates an Admissions Forum ,though even when it did it took no action to correct the Charter's misapplication of it's close walking distance policy . Bring back the ILEA or a new pan London wide admissions policy so that all schools could operate banding to achieve a truly comprehensive intake . Unless all schools operate banding and particularly where banding is operated only in the context of the group of applicants who have applied for a school we aren't going to have comprehensive intakes .


"I suggest you look at class and race in schools in Peckham se15, that can easily service the middle classes but who shy away from them on the basis that they have a predominantly different ethnic mix and class make up to their own, lets not pretend!"


I think it's true that The Academy @Peckham has a different social and minority intake to The Charter despite it being easily accessible from East Dulwich ,being undersubscribed and residents of East Dulwich anxious to find secondary school places .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...