Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi


For various reasons I am thinking of not returning to work following my mat leave. My company offered the basic package so I have been on statutory mat pay for a while (baby is nearly 6 months). My stat pay would run out early September (after the 39 weeks). My question is whether I tell them now or wait a bit longer...if I quit the job then will I lose the last couple of months of mat pay? I've not said when I'm due to go back so they have no idea at the moment but I feel bad if I keep them hanging, particularly as I'm fairly certain I won't go...


All ideas and answers welcome!

At my place it is 8 weeks before you plan to return at which point you won't be getting any stat anyway in your case as just stretch it out to the full 12m. They can then pay you your outstanding leave etc in your final pay. Alternatively you can choose to use it before you go back. Hope that helps x
Also check whether you will have to return any of your maternity pay. In some (all?)public sector posts you have to work for something like 13 weeks after your maternity leave period before quitting in order to keep all your mat pay. Private sector rules will vary company to company.
Thanks everyone! I have checked and fortunately I don't have to repay anything! Whoooooo. Frankly they paid me such a teeny amount of company mat pay it wouldn't amount to much anyway. Appreciate all the advice, will speak about the notice period and work something out. Might just make touch to let them know I'm working on child care plans or something to keep it dragged out a little bit longer. To be honest I have an inkling my job may be made redundant soon as its only a part time role and isn't deemed to be hat fundamental to the running of the company!
My daughter is on maternity leave from her job. baby born March. She is returning to work after the October Half term and she had to go into her HR today to confirm when she was returning to work. They will not let her return to her old position in the college she works in as they reckon that she cannot job share it, so is having to drop from a 52 week contract to a 40 week contract just to work 3 days a week. Since her works nursery will only give 52 week child care contracts, she also loses out on the nursery where she would have received a 20% fee deduction as a staff member.

While you are on maternity leave you remain an employee with leave to be absent but with an obligation to return once the leave is up, so as I think everyone has said if you don't want to go back you need to resign in the normal way - by giving notice under your contract.


You wouldn't have to repay statutory maternity pay, whenever you resigned. Rules about repaying maternity pay can only apply to extra pay on top of statutory - I know you've checked that out already but I thought it might be helpful to clarify this for the benefit of others looking at the thread!


But it's generally still best to time your resignation with the end of your maternity leave because you will continue to accrue your holiday entitlement whilst you are on maternity leave - so the longer you leave it, the more holiday you will accrue. Your employer should pay out your accrued but untaken holidays when your employment ends.


If you want to give your employer certainty, there's nothing to stop you giving longer notice than your contract requires. So you can resign giving 6 months notice even though your contract only says 3 months, for example. But once you've given notice, you can't back out so obviously that's only an option if you are very sure!


If you were made redundant then you'd get a redundancy payment and possibly notice pay on top, so you'd be better off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • An abridged version of the article I posted:    The health secretary is preparing to overhaul medical regulators — the General Medical Council (GMC) and Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) — after being appalled by a series of cases in which doctors have escaped disciplinary action. Streeting told The Times: “It is clear that the current medical regulatory system is completely failing to protect Jewish patients and NHS staff.”   Doctors have been let off after spreading antisemitic tropes including claiming that Britain is “controlled by Jewish supremacy”, and claiming the architect of the attack was a “legend”. Some medics have ramped up their activity in the days after the Manchester synagogue attack.   A spokesman for the Campaign Against Antisemitism said: “Time and again, doctors who spew antisemitic bile online and in the streets are being allowed to continue practising medicine, as though calls for hatred and violence are compatible with the duty to care for others.”   Doctor who called Jews ‘worse than Nazis’ cleared Dr Rahmeh Aladwan was investigated over her social media posts, including one that stated that Israelis were “worse” than the Nazis and a claim that the “Royal Free Hospital in London is a Jewish supremacy cesspit”. Since escaping suspension by the MPTS, Aladwan has posted incessantly about Jews and Israel.   She suggested the media’s focus on the Manchester synagogue attack was an example of “Jewish supremacism”. The day after the attack Aladwan shared an image of Britain’s chief rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, with the words “rabbi genocide” emblazoned on his forehead. On Saturday, she tweeted: “Glory to the Palestinian armed resistance. Death to ‘Israel’.” Aladwan has been a member of the proscribed group Palestine Action, and has shared claims that Streeting is a “Zionist ghoul” funded by “the genocidal ‘Israel’ lobby”. At a rally earlier this year, she said that “Palestinian people who are fighting for liberation, including armed struggle” are “heroes, every single one of them”. “We are proud of our armed resistance and in Islam we call that jihad. That’s an honour. That’s how you defend your people,” she added.   The MPTS ruled that no suspension was necessary, arguing her comments would not “alarm or concern” members of the public.    On Monday night, the CAA announced that it had notified the GMC of its intent to challenge the decision not to impose the condition on Aladwan while she is under investigation. It said that her case was “one of the most egregious examples we have encountered of a regulator failing in its duty to protect the public”.   One of Aladwan’s key supporters is Dr Rehiana Ali, a consultant neurologist who was reinstated by a medical tribunal this year after describing the architect of the October 7 attacks as a “legend”, calling for Israel to be “dismantled”, and claiming that 9/11 was conducted by Mossad.   Ali has made several controversial comments in the wake of the Manchester synagogue terrorist attack, and has claimed that Streeting was an “Israeli puppet”. On October 4, she quoted a post calling for Israel to be abolished and claiming that Hamas had “done nothing to apologise for”, adding: “Agree 100%.” On October 2, about eight hours before the attack, she quoted the same post and said: “Armed resistance is the only solution.”   Ali defended her comments and told The Times that she did not believe in Israel’s right to exist. She said: “It is outrageous that the CAA weaponises an unfortunate incident to continue its defamatory attacks on doctors with a moral conscience for political ends.” Hundreds of complaints over antisemitic doctors Nearly 500 complaints of antisemitism relating to 123 doctors have been submitted to the GMC since the Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023. Of these, 84 per cent were closed at the triage stage, according to figures obtained by Jewish News in July. The rare cases where complaints have led to disciplinary action include that of Dr Manoj Sen, an NHS surgeon. Last month he was struck off for making a string of antisemitic social media comments, including referring to a Jewish man as “circumcised vermin”.   The doctor, who was working as a surgeon at Northwick Park Hospital in London, commented on a Facebook post shortly after the October 7 attacks, using the word “untermenschen” — German for subhuman — as well as the phrases “Jewish c***” and “Jew boy”. Sen also referred to the Auschwitz concentration camp along with the German phrase “Die Juden sind unsere Ungluck”, meaning “the Jews are our misfortune”.   Others have escaped serious sanctions after being reported for antisemitism. In February, Dr Kamran Ahmed, a Wolverhampton-based GP, was not struck off but given a formal warning after posting material described by the GMC as “objectively antisemitic and seriously offensive”. This included sharing a post which said: “The Israeli flag is modern-day swastika”. Dr Ellen Kriesels, a consultant paediatrician at Whittington Hospital, remains on the GMC register despite spending months making openly making racist claims. On her X account, Kriesels has claimed that “virtually every Jew has some feelings of supremacy”. The Whittington Health Trust has previously said that it was investigating and that Kriesels was not working.     Jewish doctors ‘are afraid at work’ Jewish doctors have warned that the institutional failures to tackle antisemitism extend to the British Medical Association (BMA). Those attending the BMA’s annual conference in June warned that they “feared for their safety”.    There have been widespread reports of antisemitic incidents in hospitals. In August, the University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust issued an apology over posters claiming “Zionism is Poison”. A Jewish patient who was undergoing major tests at the hospital and felt “angry, distressed and upset” after seeing some of the posters, adding: “I shouldn’t have to remove my Star of David necklace to go to a hospital visit.” Concerns have been raised at at least two NHS trusts about staff wearing pro-Palestine symbols, such as lanyards in the design of a keffiyeh and badges that say “Free Palestine”. I don't have any skin in the game with what's happening in the Middle East (most likely like many on this forum) and I stand by my clearly stated opinion on other threads that neither Hamas, nor Israel, has clean hands.  What I do care about is what happens on British soil and the idea of any ethnic group in this country - with its supposed history of tolerance and inclusion - being afraid for their lives.  There can be little doubt that the rhetoric of many on these marches fuels the killing that we saw last week.  Don't share a platform with anti Semites.  If you care so much about a community being starved, abused, bombed and oppressed, why not march for Ukraine (where we do have skin in the game), or the 150,000 blacks murdered in Sudan as well? It makes no sense to me.     
    • I bought this to repel the foxes who dug four huge holes in my tiny garden. I haven't used it, because as soon as I bought it the foxes disappeared! But maybe something to try?
    • I'm in Ulverscroft Road. So far as I know I'm getting all the post I'm expecting, but of course if there was anything not delivered which I wasn't expecting, I would never know until it eventually arrived. No problem at all with packets and parcels, and my postie is lovely! 
    • Certainly true re AI, but from experience the TFL app isn't infallible either, sadly. ETA: Though I use it a lot to (try to) see when the bus is coming!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...