Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dulwich Youth FC is looking for players now. We are looking for players in next years U10, U11, U12 and U13 age groups. That means if you are going to be in years 5-8 next year you can join now. For more information please visit www.dulwichyouthfc.co.uk or email [email protected] We need you to sign up as soon as possible as we have a league registration deadline by which all our players need to be registered with the league. We are based in Dulwich, SE22 8JU. Training on SATURDAY AFTERNOON and matches on SUNDAY. PLEASE SIGN UP NOW. Application forms can also be downloaded from this post.


www.dulwichyouthfc.co.uk

Hi Miacis,


We have no restrictions on Girls entering our teams. If you have a daughter who is going to be in years 5-8 next year, they are very welcome at Dulwich Youth FC. However they will be playing in a team with boys as well as girls. If you have any other question please do not hesitate to contact me.


Website: www.dulwichyouthfc.co.uk

Unfortunately at this time we are unable to set up a girls only team. This is due to the lack of a girls league in SE London. However we are more than happy to welcome girls into our teams for next season. Please visit our website for more information: www.dulwichyouthfc.co.uk If you have any questions please do contact us.
Training will be on a Saturday afternoon, times may change but we plan to start at 2pm until 3.15pm. Matches on Sunday will differ every week as we do not set the Kick Off times, these are set by the league so we have no control over these. We do not have a ground yet but we are looking into using either Dulwich Park or Bel-Air park, our ground for next season is yet to be confirmed.

There is a local girls' only team, the Dulwich Village Vixens. I believe they are looking for u11 to u13 players at the moment, see http://www.gumtree.com/p/community/dulwich-village-vixens-fc/1070249168.


On the league point, wouldn't it be possible to enter a girls' only team into the SELKent league ie it wouldn't need to play in a girls' only league?

Hi PippaD


Here are the answers to your questions

1) The cost is ?32 per month (?8 per week). This is only for the 9 months of the football season though. (Sep-May)

2) The first round of league matches is on Sunday 21st September, however there will be training before that and the possibility of friendly matches against other local teams.

3) There is no requirement of parents to attend matches or training. However the club at this point in time is not able to provide travel for away games. Children can either make their own way to games, there parents can drop them or you can form carpools.


If you have any other questions, please do contact me. You can visit our website at www.dulwichyouthfc.co.uk

We need more players and our sign up deadline is fast approaching, if you have children aged 9-13 and live near Dulwich than you can join Dulwich Youth FC now. Please visit our website for more information. All our coaches are FA qualified and CRB (DBS) checked.


Website: www.dulwichyouthfc.co.uk

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 7 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...