Jump to content

Recommended Posts

About the same as manufacturing then.


gsirett Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

In 2011, the FS sector contributed

> nearly 10% to this country's GVA; between

> 2005-11, the FS sector contributed 122 BILLION in

> tax revenues to the exchequer[1]

>

>

> In hard times, we always look to blame others.

>

>

> [1] (source

> https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&

> source=web&cd=3&ved=0CDYQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww

> .parliament.uk%2Fbriefing-papers%2Fsn06193.pdf&ei=

> EMvDU7zvGIXW0QXm74DYBA&usg=AFQjCNEZiCnQQfOfYGl83B2

> 2ondDPz4_iw&sig2=8kaKBJxLk5eE8Nvt5mS_6g)

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's not getting harder for everyone, the top 10%

> have seen an average increase of 12% on already

> unequal income.

>

> http://news.sky.com/story/1019820/executive-pay-uk

> s-top-bosses-see-12-percent-rise


That story doesn't say the top 10% of people have had a 12% increase in income. The story says the CEOs of the FTSE 100 companies (so 100 people) have seen a 12% increase in income.

  • 2 weeks later...

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's not getting harder for everyone, the top 10%

> have seen an average increase of 12% on already

> unequal income.

>

> http://news.sky.com/story/1019820/executive-pay-uk

> s-top-bosses-see-12-percent-rise


From the BBC


The household at the 90th percentile (that's the one for which only 10% of households have a higher income) has seen its income fall by about ?60 a week. At the other end of the spectrum, the household at the 10th percentile has seen a ?2 per week increase....

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LadyDeliah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's not getting harder for everyone, the top

> 10%

> > have seen an average increase of 12% on already

> > unequal income.

> >

> >

> http://news.sky.com/story/1019820/executive-pay-uk

>

> > s-top-bosses-see-12-percent-rise

>

> From the BBC

>

> The household at the 90th percentile (that's the

> one for which only 10% of households have a higher

> income) has seen its income fall by about ?60 a

> week. At the other end of the spectrum, the

> household at the 10th percentile has seen a ?2 per

> week increase....



Source please quids.

But anecdotally and logically - the top 10% contains all of those that tax rate went up from 40 to 45% and all those families that lost Child Benefit. Not making a political point - I think that both of those measures were OKayish in the circumstances, but I think you're confusing the super-rich and PLC board members/CEs with the top 10% when there are big differences. Clearly the top 10% still earn far more than the bottom 10% by a massive margin....but the vast majority of them (the top 10%) haven't got richer in income terms.

My main beef is with the top 1% anyway. The corporate heads who've made a killing from the decreased overheads as a result of things like workfare, reduced labour costs overall due to employment instabity and an increase in unemployed people willing to accept anything just to get a job.


Many have hoovered up businesses that have gone bust and when they bother to actually pay tax, regular corporation tax is only 20% with tax on dividends only 10%.


The number of millionaires has dramatically increased too, so I still think that there is all-in-this-together shite.


Sources are from all over the past and tucked away in the back of my head, but I'll post any I come accords (which I do fairly frequently).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • People don’t go out of their way to leave  their valuables out on the porch  they are most likely at work when a delivery company decides on their behalf to just leave it on the doorstep.  They are the problem not “people being surprised when their items disappear” 
    • Yes, Direct Line automatically rejected it when I tried to get a quote. Insurers really are a nightmare, and they have a huge psychological impact on buyers. When you’re about to put £1m into a pile of bricks, and the insurance companies either refuse to insure it or quote an outrageous premium, of course it’s going to scare anyone. I’m not actually worried about subsidence in this house main building , but the bay window has definitely been affected by that tree, and the council won’t remove it. When the movement continues, rebuilding the bay window would cost at least £40k. The seller will never admit this, but there are already houses on that street where the bay windows have had to be rebuilt. If not East Dulwich, I’m now looking towards the west. There are a lot of subsidence issues with properties in Forest Hill, and Bromley and West Wickham aren’t really for me. I’m not interested in any part of Dulwich except ED, ND and Dulwich Village — and obviously ED offers the best value.
    • Not sure what you are looking for, but my suggestion would be around Forest Hill, certain parts of Bromley and West Wickham  Telegraph Hill. All nice areas- safe and you get more for your money. Really depends on how you travel, or don’t.. as inn needing good transport links to City. Like I said, feel free to pm me.. abit difficult to advise if not sure what you are after, but pretty sure not a flat!  oh, West Dulwich and Herne Hill area.  
    • I honestly can’t believe how TW operates. Just like the councils and UK Power Networks — what kind of people are they? I’ve cried my way through some projects because I had to liaise with these departments. No wonder I feel like running away every time their names come up. I first started thinking about walking away when I noticed the main water issue with TW (which would delay the project), the potential drainage problem, and the higher insurance claims than what I was initially told, plus the ongoing issues. Subsidences can be very different,  my current house definitely had subsidence back in 50 years ago, but the previous owner never made any claims, and there has never been a drainage issue or damp issue. All of this has increased my concern about the project time and resale value. I don’t want this to turn into a liability instead of an asset.  I’m now also looking at properties in Clapham common, same price, a lot bigger
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...