Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I feel so sorry for all those poor people in Dulwich Village struggling to pay the school fees, otherwise they would definitely be richer than the people in ED and Peckham. It's a shame that they can't send their children to state schools because they're full of the hoi polloi.

Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I feel so sorry for all those poor people in

> Dulwich Village struggling to pay the school fees,

> otherwise they would definitely be richer than the

> people in ED and Peckham. It's a shame that they

> can't send their children to state schools because

> they're full of the hoi polloi.



I grew up in Dulwich Village and went to a state school.

Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I feel so sorry for all those poor people in

> Dulwich Village struggling to pay the school fees,

> otherwise they would definitely be richer than the

> people in ED and Peckham. It's a shame that they

> can't send their children to state schools because

> they're full of the hoi polloi.


> I grew up in Dulwich Village and went to a state school.>


So did my kids, jah lush. I should have put the words "irony alert" at the end of my post.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > To be fair its a few years ago since you last

> > bothered the school gates Jah.

>

> Fi tru dat.


It's actually pronounced Fi real dat. You can say tru dat, just leave out the fi. You can also say fi tru and leave out the dat.


Glad to help. Jah!

And then fire rockets into it.


vgrant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seeing as we all now support plucky little israel

> on the boards, why not use their example as our

> inspiration - encircle the whole of Dulwich

> Village with a big concrete wall to keep the riff

> raff out and the gentlefolk safe.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Zebedee Tring Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yo, dem Dulwich Village wimmin is well fit,

> innit?

>

>

> Fi tru.

>

> (Jamaican patois lesson learnt at the Rolo Tomassi

> Grammar School).

>

> No one said 'fi real' in my day old bean.


They did in my house.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> NewWave Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I really like the atmosphere in Dulwich village

> > the houses are much nicer than in ED however I

> do

> > feel there isn't much there really,



>

>

> So by "atmosphere" you mean the nicer houses?


> I really like the atmosphere in Dulwich village

> > the houses are much nicer than in ED however I

> do

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...