Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ha - that's the best rubbish article since they commissioned someone to write 500 words on how Compare the Meerkats was a shocking piece of racism.


ETA:


I found the Meerkat article.


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/aug/22/advertising-racism-meerkats

To be fair, the comments are quite funny (although they may be the work of Right wing trolls).


And as Strafer says this isn't the Guardian propa..the author(ess)- I presume that's sexist? - is apparently a lecturer in some media studies type degree in a 2nd rate ex-poly, which is encouraging..... that not that bright 19 year olds, getting into debt they'll never pay to be 'taught' by this academic excellence...


*gone to the dogs, etc*

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ha ha!

> >

> > Quids actually reads The Guardian

>

>

> I think Loz and I qualify as its most loyal

> readers


:)

And Lady ????'s likes it too

We could really have a "Stupid Comment Pieces in the Guardian" thread. This one last week was a classic...


http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jul/20/is-it-ok-to-buy-coffee-from-an-independent


As someone in the comments said, "I think we have now reached peak Guardian."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think, from memory for LHR, we are under a holding pattern so if LHR is backed up we may get more planes overhead. There are multiple holding patterns so it is not always ours that is used and it generally depends on the wind direction as to which is used. 
    • Abandoned along Green Dale. I'm assuming it's been stolen as it looks like it belongs to a 5-6 year old. Let me know if it's yours
    • Let's be very clear some of her friends are cleary trying to say she lost her job due to a media conspiracy. This is nonsense. She lost her job because she broke the ministerial code of conduct - that has nothing to do with the media. Was she under the spotlight because she was outspoken and happy to aggressivley attack any indiscretion of her opponents? Absolutely. But what's that saying: those who shout loudest often have the most to hide...never has that seemed more apt? Given that scrutiny she would have been wise to have been whiter than white but she wasn't and she has paid the price.
    • So you are justifying building on the green belt, in Londons case "the lungs of London" which will causes harm to natures ability to turn co2 into o2? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...