Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So it's Mayweather v Maidana II tomorrow. What do you reckon ?

I managed to get-up just in time for the start of the first contest and was gobsmacked during round 1 because Maidana was bossing it and I'd never seen Floyd compromised like that. As the rounds progressed Maidana's dominance (if it ever really was that) diminished exponentially, leaving Floyd owning the rounds. The decision could never have been Maidana's.

But it's months later and Floyd Mayweather is older.

I think Maidana gets schooled tomorrow. He says he knows Floyd now, having fought him once - but the opposite must also be true and Floyd brings plans A-Z to the table being always able to adjust to what's in front of him. Don't quote me tho.

Papers say Mayweather put in a dominant performance. The weigh-in photos showed him cut like I've never seen, how much extra work he must have done to science that bewilders me because he's a certified gym rat anyway.

The only boxers remaining IMO to prove there are no peers remaining, are:

Pacquiao

Brook

Thurman

Bradley

If he doesn't cover these names in his last 2 fights (or three, if he decides to try beat Rocky Marciano's record) then his legacy isn't as solid as it could have been.

Khan's surely out of the running now, unless it's a big money fight in UK ?

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

In the early hours of tomoro morning Bernard Hopkins will be putting his two LightHeavyweight world titles up against Sergey Kovalev's one world title. Kovalev has been avoided by all the other top heavyweights, he exposed Nathan Cleverly, he's knocked out 23/25 opponents he's faced.

Hopkins has chosen this fight to unify the titles and become undisputed champion at the weight.

Hopkins will not lose this fight on points, because Kovalev can't outbox him. He can only lose by KO.

Hopkins cannot win by KO, he can only win on points.

This means Hopkins has willingly chosen to spend 12 rounds in the ring with a wrecking machine.


He gets my total respect for stepping-up and challenging Kovalev in pursuit of unification. He may have seen something he can exploit, something the other top LHW fighters have not seen (or are unable to see).

But he's got serious balls for setting-up this contest.


And all this, regardless of what his age is- even if he was in his early 30's he'd be brave to take this fight.

If he was 'old' in the sense of unable to defend himself, weak, unfit, history of being hit a lot, slow, unskilled and from a lower-tier level I'd certainly want him to retire, for his own good.

But he's none of the above.

Whatever he decides I wish him the best.

I think he'd beat Stevenson, so there's a belt right there - trouble is he'd need to face Kovalev again to unify !!

He's voiced interest previously in fighting Golovkin.

The guy's mental !

Kovalev was too big for Hopkins on fight night, Kov is a natural LH - this was a big part of the outcome.

To think Hopkins took Kov the distance when no-one else has I think speaks volumes for his ability, compared to the rest.

  • 3 weeks later...

Excellent Saturday evening of boxing this coming weekend.

Fury v Chisora II

Saunders v Eubank

Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Plus other stuff on the card (I think Liam Walsh).


Been following the build-up ?

Who d'ya fancy ?


For me it's: Chisora, Eubank, Gavin.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • The lady is called Janet 
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...