Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jacks09 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd like to see him fight Chisora next!




That statement alone tells you where he really is. The fact he holds a world title is a nonsense, and he'll probably have several defences against no hopers. Martin was about as impressive last night as Harrison was when he took on Haye.

In my view AJ should fight level such as Takam, Pulev, Helenius, Haye (who after 2yrs out cannot be rated any higher).

There's talk of him fighting Briggs, which would be a suitable level, also he could face Tony Thompson.

Then he can go for the 1st-tier contenders, then the other belt holders - although he'd probably be OK with Lukas Browne right now.

The PPV aspect of AJ's promotion is a total turn-off though, especially as it's already been PPV on his earlier contests.

Agree the IBF title is probably the weakest belt, I'd like to see him in against Haye, thinking the outcome would be different, only time will tell. As said above his opponents will be well picked to get some defences under his belt before he tries one of the other heavy weight champions. As Joshua said, it is only a 1/4 of the way there. Lets see how far he can go.

jacks09 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agree he has won the weakest belt in

> history.....but Chisora went the distance with

> klit schmo. He has on,y had 16 fights......he

> shouldn't be fighting better opposition

> now......he has knocked out every one in front of

> him, I don't get the negativity....



I don't mean to be so negative. To be fair, it's not his fault that a chance came up for him to win a world title, and it's not his fault the guy with that belt was so poor (had Martin not been so poor, he'd have probably fought someone else).


I just can't stand all the press today raving about it and telling us about how he's become a champ quicker than the likes of Ali, Lewis, Tyson. Real greats.


I think AJ has every chance of becoming a real great, but he ain't there yet.

So we're all agreed on the kind of opponent we think AJ should fight next.

Regarding him being a great, there's obviously a lot of potential but I don't think anyone is actually calling him a great just yet. The comparisons against Mercer, Tyson, Spinks are all valid because they are just mathematical comparisons. i.e. (something like) AJ has got a world belt in less rounds than Leon Spinks, if that's what the record says then that's the fact. It doesn't mean (and I don't think anyone has said) that AJ is >= the greats.

We've seen it all before with Audley, so let's see what happens.

I thought he would lose last night so I'm certainly in Otta's camp regarding not getting our hopes up too soon, but I've not seen him declared best ever by anyone yet (and you have to ignore Hearn, because he's just a promoter and will say whatever is required to fill stadiums / sell PPV !!)

Looking at the manner in which Errol Spence dispatched Chris Algieri to become the IBF mandatory this weekend. I'm genuinely interested to see whether Kell Brook will defend against him.

I don't think Brook is chicken, but there are certainly easier defences available (I think Brook can defend against a couple of optional opponents first) and Hearn will surely steer this according to his needs.


Spence is a nightmare opponent. I think Brook would beat him actually. But for me Spence would beat other WW champs.

  • 3 weeks later...

I think the result was all but certain, Khan's had the big fight he wanted and will never need to work again - pretty good for a man his age.

He seems to switch-off and at this level there's a price to pay.

I hope the KO doesn't damage Khan too much.

I think he should fight Brook in UK then retire, win or lose.

He's a young man with a young family and could train his own stable, commentate, the list is endless.


So Canelo beat a guy that came-up two weight divisions to face him (which is an enormous physical effort to do) and was still 15-20lbs lighter than him on fight night. He was outboxed for 4 rounds by a guy so much lighter than him.

I'm losing respect for the Mexican fast (but I accept he may not be overly stressed about that!), he needs to stop using his amazing ability to boil-down just so he can get advantage over other fighters. It's totally taking the mick out of the weight divisions and belts and is somehow allowed due to powers that be in boxing politics. If Khan had faced any other (on the night) fighter 15-20lbs heavier than him (and USED to fighting at that weight) it would have been called a mismatch, ie. George Groves.

But JUST because Groves, and other fighters cannot boil-down, but Canelo can, he's allowed to fight smaller guys.

It's perverse, dangerous and unfair.

I agree, he seems to switch off. People say he's chinny, but I think discipline is more his problem. All that skill, speed and heart... but he gets caught when he could have covered up, or even darted back out of range. Nevertheless, I quite like him (even though he says stupid things) and I think he could maybe beat Brook.


As for Canelo, I can see why he's popular as he's always entertaining. But I'm kinda sick of this catchweight thing. You want to call yourself the middleweight champ, then fight GGG at the full weight, and then let's see what happens!

Canelo still has a rematch clause to honour with Cotto, I believe.

Khan's chin is fine, the KOs he's had would drop most guys at his weight, but he's open to some huge shots it's so careless and he throws away all the good work from earlier rounds (just like with Garcia).

I am reading that Khan gassed a bit, I haven't seen the contest so can't comment (yet). But keeping your arms up in Rd6 is not a tall order, even for amateurs - let alone Olympians and top-tier fighters.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've never got Christmas pudding. The only times I've managed to make it vaguely acceptable to people is thus: Buy a really tiny one when it's remaindered in Tesco's. They confound carbon dating, so the yellow labelled stuff at 75% off on Boxing Day will keep you going for years. Chop it up and soak it in Stones Ginger Wine and left over Scotch. Mix it in with a decent vanilla ice cream. It's like a festive Rum 'n' Raisin. Or: Stick a couple in a demijohn of Aldi vodka and serve it to guests, accompanied by 'The Party's Over' by Johnny Mathis when people simply won't leave your flat.
    • Not miserable at all! I feel the same and also want to complain to the council but not sure who or where best to aim it at? I have flagged it with our local MP and one Southwark councillor previously but only verbally when discussing other things and didn’t get anywhere other than them agreeing it was very frustrating etc. but would love to do something on paper. I think they’ve been pretty much every night for the last couple of weeks and my cat is hating it! As am I !
    • That is also a Young's pub, like The Cherry Tree. However fantastic the menu looks, you might want to ask exactly who will cook the food on the day, and how. Also, if  there is Christmas pudding on the menu, you might want to ask how that will be cooked, and whether it will look and/or taste anything like the Christmas puddings you have had in the past.
    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...