Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not the kind of person who thinks when it gets dark you can't use the goose green play park but as I walked my dog tonight there was a couple using the play park again I have nothing against this but when you have to staffies (not against these type of dogs either) but if you let them run free and chew the swings and other play area items I hope you clean up after yourself as it's not just my children who play in it and I would expect you to read the sign which says no dogs allowed. Yes with other dogs about they might seem aggressive but have them on a lead and keep them together or use the main park (I do and I clean up after my dog as well).

Common sense please

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/48346-late-night-playground-users/
Share on other sites

Sorry Alice but I never said I was in the playground as I read signs that say no dogs allowed but if think that it's ok to allow your dog's to run free in an area that doesn't allow dogs as it is for children (and clearly signed) I just hope the person cleans up after their dogs as I said in my OP I'm not against people using the playground after dark but consider others who would use it

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> so to clarify you took your dog for a walk in a

> playground and saw two people who were doing the

> same thing. spooky.


You don't appear to have a concept of clarity alice. You may do if you read the post you comment about first. However I'm not sure you are particularly interested in clarity.

CE another person who doesn't read my post correctly I said "in the children's play park" with dogs that were running free chewing the swings,and it's got nothing to do with class rather a kids playground and it's use we have a perfectly good park not 10 feet from it to exercise a dog

ce Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fishfoot - you sound like a virgin living in a

> flatshare resorting to post-it notes rather than

> actually having a conversation with said "staffie'

> owners.

>


Was this comment really necessary?

Shame on you ce *tut tuts*

Why would you enter that area with a dog in the first place? It's fully fenced off so you actually have to go out of your way to get in there. It's clearly signed. I think some behaviour is just intended to invite challenge / cause a row.

We should care if some selfish pr*ck is vandalising the kids swings.

I don't understand why people think it is ok to take dogs into a dog free zone? If it is dark, then if their dog does something, they are less likely to be able to find it and clear up (tho I suspect they probably wouldn't) As has been mentioned, goose green, where the dog could have a proper runaround is just across the way.


I don't understand why the OP is getting grief for thinking this is unacceptable - I'm a dog owner and I certainly don't.

I'm not bothered about dogs chewing stuff, as I doubt they'd really do much damage. But if I took my kid to a playground and they stepped (or worse, fell) in shit, I'd be livid.


There is simply no need for people to take their dogs in there, end of.


And ce, your post just makes you sound like a "virgin living in a flatshare" resorting to hiding behind a keyboard rather than actually having the bottle to be that muh of a prick to someone's face.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not bothered about dogs chewing stuff, as I

> doubt they'd really do much damage. But if I took

> my kid to a playground and they stepped (or worse,

> fell) in shit, I'd be livid.

>

> There is simply no need for people to take their

> dogs in there, end of.

>

> And ce, your post just makes you sound like a

> "virgin living in a flatshare" resorting to hiding

> behind a keyboard rather than actually having the

> bottle to be that muh of a prick to someone's

> face.


As is often the case Otta puts it better than I.

ce Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fishfoot - you sound like a virgin living in a

> flatshare resorting to post-it notes rather than

> actually having a conversation with said "staffie'

> owners.

>

> OMG!! someone with a dog is in the park after

> dark!! Not very "middle class" is it?!?!?

>

> Note - who cares?!?!?


WTF Is this guy a troll!!!!!


Should be taken off the forum with his offensive sexist comments.. Nasty!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They used to have dedicated park wardens, who I'm sure used to look after the parks and locked and opened the gates. Years ago I knew someone who was one. I thought they were based in that hut by the toilets. Are they not there any more? The community wardens are attached to the police rather than a specific park, aren't they?
    • Yes, sad how Rye Lane has taken a dive, interesting to see those pics CPR Dave. It's shocking how the section between Choumert Road and the Nag's Head in particular has lost its vibrancy, meanwhile the next section to the top of Peckham Rye Common has gentrified. Wonder why such a distinction in fortunes? Anyway the station square plans have fallen behind yet again, demolition won't now start this summer. The only "work" that will now take place this summer is surveying of the arcade, which they've had 10 years since planning permission to do. At least the replacement TSB branch has progressed but the Blenheim Grove corner building still looks unfinished, despite claims it "is now complete". https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/current-and-future-development/peckham-and-nunhead-2
    • DKH was two form entry, it is now one form entry to cope with the fact it was far more under subscribed than other schools in the area. They had actually combined year groups into single classes, 3/4 and 5/6.  When a school changes name, it’s usually because of a bad reputation perhaps the results.  The new name is dry with no history unlike its current name. It’s a very sketchy decision. It’s an expensive vanity project for someone.  What  will happen if the name change does not increase applications to the school?     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...