Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not the kind of person who thinks when it gets dark you can't use the goose green play park but as I walked my dog tonight there was a couple using the play park again I have nothing against this but when you have to staffies (not against these type of dogs either) but if you let them run free and chew the swings and other play area items I hope you clean up after yourself as it's not just my children who play in it and I would expect you to read the sign which says no dogs allowed. Yes with other dogs about they might seem aggressive but have them on a lead and keep them together or use the main park (I do and I clean up after my dog as well).

Common sense please

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/48346-late-night-playground-users/
Share on other sites

Sorry Alice but I never said I was in the playground as I read signs that say no dogs allowed but if think that it's ok to allow your dog's to run free in an area that doesn't allow dogs as it is for children (and clearly signed) I just hope the person cleans up after their dogs as I said in my OP I'm not against people using the playground after dark but consider others who would use it

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> so to clarify you took your dog for a walk in a

> playground and saw two people who were doing the

> same thing. spooky.


You don't appear to have a concept of clarity alice. You may do if you read the post you comment about first. However I'm not sure you are particularly interested in clarity.

CE another person who doesn't read my post correctly I said "in the children's play park" with dogs that were running free chewing the swings,and it's got nothing to do with class rather a kids playground and it's use we have a perfectly good park not 10 feet from it to exercise a dog

ce Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fishfoot - you sound like a virgin living in a

> flatshare resorting to post-it notes rather than

> actually having a conversation with said "staffie'

> owners.

>


Was this comment really necessary?

Shame on you ce *tut tuts*

Why would you enter that area with a dog in the first place? It's fully fenced off so you actually have to go out of your way to get in there. It's clearly signed. I think some behaviour is just intended to invite challenge / cause a row.

We should care if some selfish pr*ck is vandalising the kids swings.

I don't understand why people think it is ok to take dogs into a dog free zone? If it is dark, then if their dog does something, they are less likely to be able to find it and clear up (tho I suspect they probably wouldn't) As has been mentioned, goose green, where the dog could have a proper runaround is just across the way.


I don't understand why the OP is getting grief for thinking this is unacceptable - I'm a dog owner and I certainly don't.

I'm not bothered about dogs chewing stuff, as I doubt they'd really do much damage. But if I took my kid to a playground and they stepped (or worse, fell) in shit, I'd be livid.


There is simply no need for people to take their dogs in there, end of.


And ce, your post just makes you sound like a "virgin living in a flatshare" resorting to hiding behind a keyboard rather than actually having the bottle to be that muh of a prick to someone's face.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not bothered about dogs chewing stuff, as I

> doubt they'd really do much damage. But if I took

> my kid to a playground and they stepped (or worse,

> fell) in shit, I'd be livid.

>

> There is simply no need for people to take their

> dogs in there, end of.

>

> And ce, your post just makes you sound like a

> "virgin living in a flatshare" resorting to hiding

> behind a keyboard rather than actually having the

> bottle to be that muh of a prick to someone's

> face.


As is often the case Otta puts it better than I.

ce Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fishfoot - you sound like a virgin living in a

> flatshare resorting to post-it notes rather than

> actually having a conversation with said "staffie'

> owners.

>

> OMG!! someone with a dog is in the park after

> dark!! Not very "middle class" is it?!?!?

>

> Note - who cares?!?!?


WTF Is this guy a troll!!!!!


Should be taken off the forum with his offensive sexist comments.. Nasty!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks that’s all really useful.
    • Looks like they have massive issues with numbers of visitors too... “People have literally just arrived and are refusing to leave. Chaos. They booked out all the lane spaces but let people in. Absolute sh*t show.” https://www.the-londoner.co.uk/were-police-called-to-brockwell-lido/
    • I agree that someone somewhere must at one point decided on their purpose, however if anything was ever written down it is probably long lost, given the turnover of councillors and council staff . The Crofton Park noticeboards I mentioned above are solely for information about the council  and various community groups and activities, plus  various community related things such as the library times and services.  I think they are very bright, interesting and inviting, however I am not going back there solely in order to take a photo The ones in East Dulwich don't have much on them because ... well, for the reasons on this thread 🤣 Quite apart from the fact that these are supposed to be community notice boards, there are all sorts of reasons why they should not be used for private businesses to advertise, as I and others have already said. Yes there have been huge changes in the area, but I can't see how those changes affect the purpose of community noticeboards, unless you think that the changes mean that there is no longer a "community" in East Dulwich. Which would be very sad indeed. Anyway, I am stepping away from this thread now, I have other things to do 🙄
    • From experience, it's the norm that the local authority reject appeals regardless of facts. Suggest you appeal and highlight that you followed the requirements by using the app to log the parking session and the failure of the app / network to register this is a technical issue beyond your control for which you can not be held responsible for and accordingly not penalised. Also that the traffic wardens records confirm you were parked for less than the free period so again should not be penalised. Do a search on web for similar appeals The 'fight back forum' website used to be very good for people sharing there appeals experience; and looks like this is no longer running but try https://www.ftla.uk I've appealed loads of Penalty Charge Notices for myself, friends and family and all been successful. In approx half of the appeals the local authority did not even respond and were won by default.  Re 20p fee - check if you you have text message alert 'on' as these are generally charged for and if so turn it off to save text fee. Hope this helps For Clarity, you need to follow the process, so have to first appeal to the local authority that issued the PCN (sounds like you've done this).  Then you can appeal to the London Tribunals and the local authority have to tell you this and tell you your reference number to submit this appeal.   Also when you submit appeal - choose 'no contravention occurred'
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...