Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not the kind of person who thinks when it gets dark you can't use the goose green play park but as I walked my dog tonight there was a couple using the play park again I have nothing against this but when you have to staffies (not against these type of dogs either) but if you let them run free and chew the swings and other play area items I hope you clean up after yourself as it's not just my children who play in it and I would expect you to read the sign which says no dogs allowed. Yes with other dogs about they might seem aggressive but have them on a lead and keep them together or use the main park (I do and I clean up after my dog as well).

Common sense please

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/48346-late-night-playground-users/
Share on other sites

Sorry Alice but I never said I was in the playground as I read signs that say no dogs allowed but if think that it's ok to allow your dog's to run free in an area that doesn't allow dogs as it is for children (and clearly signed) I just hope the person cleans up after their dogs as I said in my OP I'm not against people using the playground after dark but consider others who would use it

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> so to clarify you took your dog for a walk in a

> playground and saw two people who were doing the

> same thing. spooky.


You don't appear to have a concept of clarity alice. You may do if you read the post you comment about first. However I'm not sure you are particularly interested in clarity.

CE another person who doesn't read my post correctly I said "in the children's play park" with dogs that were running free chewing the swings,and it's got nothing to do with class rather a kids playground and it's use we have a perfectly good park not 10 feet from it to exercise a dog

ce Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fishfoot - you sound like a virgin living in a

> flatshare resorting to post-it notes rather than

> actually having a conversation with said "staffie'

> owners.

>


Was this comment really necessary?

Shame on you ce *tut tuts*

Why would you enter that area with a dog in the first place? It's fully fenced off so you actually have to go out of your way to get in there. It's clearly signed. I think some behaviour is just intended to invite challenge / cause a row.

We should care if some selfish pr*ck is vandalising the kids swings.

I don't understand why people think it is ok to take dogs into a dog free zone? If it is dark, then if their dog does something, they are less likely to be able to find it and clear up (tho I suspect they probably wouldn't) As has been mentioned, goose green, where the dog could have a proper runaround is just across the way.


I don't understand why the OP is getting grief for thinking this is unacceptable - I'm a dog owner and I certainly don't.

I'm not bothered about dogs chewing stuff, as I doubt they'd really do much damage. But if I took my kid to a playground and they stepped (or worse, fell) in shit, I'd be livid.


There is simply no need for people to take their dogs in there, end of.


And ce, your post just makes you sound like a "virgin living in a flatshare" resorting to hiding behind a keyboard rather than actually having the bottle to be that muh of a prick to someone's face.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not bothered about dogs chewing stuff, as I

> doubt they'd really do much damage. But if I took

> my kid to a playground and they stepped (or worse,

> fell) in shit, I'd be livid.

>

> There is simply no need for people to take their

> dogs in there, end of.

>

> And ce, your post just makes you sound like a

> "virgin living in a flatshare" resorting to hiding

> behind a keyboard rather than actually having the

> bottle to be that muh of a prick to someone's

> face.


As is often the case Otta puts it better than I.

ce Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fishfoot - you sound like a virgin living in a

> flatshare resorting to post-it notes rather than

> actually having a conversation with said "staffie'

> owners.

>

> OMG!! someone with a dog is in the park after

> dark!! Not very "middle class" is it?!?!?

>

> Note - who cares?!?!?


WTF Is this guy a troll!!!!!


Should be taken off the forum with his offensive sexist comments.. Nasty!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
    • Unless you're 5 years old or have been living in a cave for several decades you can't be for real. I don't believe that you're genuinely confused by this, no one who has access to newspapers, the tv news, the internet would ask this. Either you're an infant, or have recently woken up from a coma after decades, or you're a supercilious tw*t
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...