Jump to content

Recycling boxes (please stop nicking them)


TJ

Recommended Posts

JenniferJ Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just home after a spot of dinner and our recycling

> bag (FULL!) has been nicked from Upland Road. If

> you are the culprit hang your head in shame, it's

> pathetic.

>

> I'll now have to order more from the council -

> that's what you should have done mr /ms thieving

> *@!&$**!

>

> Amazed this has happened in this day and age.

> Sorry to innocent others for this rant but this

> has really got my goat.


Let me assure you it wasn't me. Or at least I'm pretty sure I haven't stolen from you. It's not very likely I reckon.

Upland Road's right on my manor. Doorstep, my own, shitting. Not my style.

So you can rule me out of your enquiries. But good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks HonaloochieB, I will eliminate you from the 'possible' list ;-)


I have calmed down a bit more, just worried that my careful recycling could now be in a bin somewhere - I am a greenie and can't bear the thought of any of my paper ending up in landfill.


Also, I am having a serious clear-out and now probably will have to wait a week before a new bag arrives, so have nowhere to put my recycling till then, humph.


All I'll repeat is 'hang your head in shame' to the culprit...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JenniferJ, I'd be more worried that someone's taken your recycling home to have a good sift through to find "useful" information :( Hope you don't put name/address info in there without destroying it first?


I'm wary, as had a few credit card applications submitted in my name a couple of years back after our recycling bag had obviously been rifled through over night. We now put the bag out first thing in the morning, and are a lot more careful about what we put in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also had a few attempts at identity theft after our bin was gone through. Its not very environmental to say, but all personal docs now go on the fire to avoid the same.... I wish there was a secure recycling plus normal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...