Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I found myself singing the Grand Old Duke of York out loud yesterday while I was on my own walking my dog around the park. Didn't even have any kids with me to make me look less of a nutter. I stopped as soon as I realised what I was doing, but I'd been merrily singing away for a good 20 meters or so without realising.

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know if it counts but I used to knock one

> out whilst watching Zena warrior princess.


BBW, I assume you're admitting to a w@nk as opposed to poleaxing one of the audience.

Just checking.

Let's just go straight to the top of Saturday morning crumpet here - Zoe Ball.

The beginning, middle and end of Saturday morning hangover TV.

On with Jamie thingy, and had the best puppets with Sage and Onion.

Seriously, she was and is unbeatable.

Though Ant & Dec on ITV did come close.

Disgusting behavior I know. When I was in the army cadets on Lordship lane as a lad we caught our corporal 'tea potting' whilst watching a copy of 'Swallows and Amazons'. For those of you who don't know or aren't at the disadvantage of having a revolting sense of humour the act of tea potting is performed by shoving your thumb up your arsehole whilst manually coaxing out some population paste which to a consenting or clandestine viewer put the w@anker into an a sort of abstract position of a tea pot, if you know what I mean.

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Disgusting behavior I know. When I was in the army

> cadets on Lordship lane as a lad we caught our

> corporal 'tea potting' whilst watching a copy of

> 'Swallows and Amazons'. For those of you who don't

> know or aren't at the disadvantage of having a

> revolting sense of humour the act of tea potting

> is performed by shoving your thumb up your

> arsehole whilst manually coaxing out some

> population paste which to a consenting or

> clandestine viewer put the w@anker into an a sort

> of abstract position of a tea pot, if you know

> what I mean.


I'm not one for applying emoticons, but even if I was, w@nking corporal, with his thumb up his arse, seems highly specialised. And as for where Swallows And Amazons comes in, I'm not sure.

Now I thik of it, I assume it's one of those 'special' films involving tall ladies doing something special to someone they like very much

I'm also not one for quoting Richard Littlejohn, but you couldn't make it up. You really couldn't

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...