Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently a new show will shortly be hitting our

> screens dedicated to the joys of watching paint

> dry. Doubtless it will be a huge success.



But not quite as popular as the show dedicated to watching those who are watching the show about paint drying. I believe its to be called 'Gogglepaintbox'...

Not really a fan but did watch last night.


It was indeed a farce. Do not remember in the past the selection system with the seats. ??


Simon Cowell seems to run the show.


Understand the judges do not wear ear-pieces and do not get directions from the shows producers. Yeah ??


.. oh and the Pope is not a Catholic.


DulwichFox

I do actually quite enjoy the early audition stages if I'm honest with myself. The newish boot camp format is awful though.

Judge's Houses makes me want to roast bunnies alive and the main show makes me lose the will to live.


It's almost bearable if you read the Guardian Live Blog at the same time though.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do actually quite enjoy the early audition

> stages if I'm honest with myself. The newish boot

> camp format is awful though.


Yer.. I sort of like the early stages with all the bad auditions. :)


The rest just drags on too long. but is done to make 10s X 1000's ?s ?M's in fact in phone call votes.


I believe watching it whilst undergoing Root-Canal Treatment makes the programme more bearable.

Problem is 12 weeks of root-canal treatment is very expensive.


So I just go to the pub.


Foxy

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have to say, the Guardian live blog of the

> X-factor is a joy to behold.


I love the way she gets really obsessive about weird details, like Louis' total lack of wit or humanity, nicole's insanity gary's beard length etc...

nicely reflects my main issue with x-factor that it sells bad ideals and is less escapism than making people feel bad about their normal lives.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/09/the-x-factor-real-job-syco


for once there was something worthwhile in the comments "X-factor is just a gap year from Argos"

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's a guy who does it as well (Stuart

> Heritage) who is otherwise a truly dire writer,

> but is totally in his element here. Laugh out

> loud funny.


aw I really quite like Stuart Heritage (although I haven't bought the Guardian since I turned 30*), I follow him on twitter (waves to quids).


agree with AQ, I miss AC too. Especially her unique, incisive outlook on life and fabulous cookery tips.


*round about the time Corn Laws were implemented.

I love the X-Factor


And if you don't, well just go f-UKIP yourself


Now that the niceities are over, i'm going to focus hard on the talent. Tho i've missed a few shows, due to work commitments of late, so i'm on catch up


As for Ac, she's on a path to recovery, i'm told by my source. Get well soon Annette, the finals are coming.


Edited to correct spalling

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love the X-Factor

>

> And if you don't, well just go f-UKIP yourself

>

> Now that the niceities are over, i'm going to

> focus hard on the talent. Tho i've missed a few

> shows, due to work commitments of late, so i'm on

> catch up

>

> As for Ac, she's on a path to recovery, i'm told

> by my source. Get well soon Annette, the finals

> are coming.

>

> Edited to correct spalling



Give her my love & tell her I'll be eagerly awaiting her comments during the live shows!

There's too many of them at the moment - like flies buzzing around the dungheap.


The 'you're at weeeeeebleeeeeey' (arena, ahem) has been a trial though. A masterclass in US-style clunky-editing, zooming-in on hapless acne-ridden proles whooping on demand, desperate pantomime drama - and that stupid finger pushing the fader up.


Judges Houses and the first few live shows always a winner though, followed inevitably by the two month slow ride round the ITV u-bend and down into the stinking sewer below.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...