Jump to content
Message added by Administrator,

Due to this topic being excessively long, a new 2024 "New Shops in Dulwich / Peckham" has been opened here. Please continue the discussion there.

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Penguin68 said:

Actually, this is unlikely - most of the shop foot-prints are too small for most High St chain stores - although the restaurants are more compatible with size requirements. Chains are already - mainly - in the ones with sufficient space, so more are unlikely (although there will be changes - as M&S occupied Iceland's space). 

Chain stores or chain restaurants (Chipotle, Joe and the Juice, Wagamamas, etc.), the point remains that if the independent shops want to maintain their spot then they should take a look at those independents who have people queuing outside them daily and ask themselves where they're going wrong... 

There are those who can and those who can't and lucky for the area, ED supports both groups of shoppers.

Personally I would tather pay a bit more for bread with good ingredients than cheap mass produced bread. However that's my personal choice and I fully respect others decisions on what they can and can not afford.  Food shouldn't be one upmanship but quality food should be available to all. 

  • Like 2
19 hours ago, jazzer said:

Who can afford the prices charged by Toad bakery, haven't they heard their is a cost of living CRISIS???????

East Dulwich is mostly unaffected by this crisis. Most people are loaded, and live in houses that are worth at least the £1million mark. Its why M&S moved in, taking over from the budget chain Iceland. If people can afford M&S shopping, 40p on a carton of milk or pack of pasta is not going to make a jot of difference to them, they are already wealthy enough to pay way over the odds for their groceries. 

No it's NOT.

Yes, people live in expensive houses, that's because houses have increased in value exponentially, it doesn't make people "loaded",as the value is in the property not in their pocket. 

If they choose to "pay way over the odds for groceries" it's because i) they don't value money and ii) they've got more money than sense, plain and simple. 

 

Just because people live in ED or on the fringes that's choice. Just stand back a moment and consider what properties cost 30 - 40 yeasr ago compared to today, then you'll understand why people are not cash rich and loaded.  

 

 

40 minutes ago, jazzer said:

No it's NOT.

Yes, people live in expensive houses, that's because houses have increased in value exponentially, it doesn't make people "loaded",as the value is in the property not in their pocket. 

If they choose to "pay way over the odds for groceries" it's because i) they don't value money and ii) they've got more money than sense, plain and simple. 

 

Just because people live in ED or on the fringes that's choice. Just stand back a moment and consider what properties cost 30 - 40 yeasr ago compared to today, then you'll understand why people are not cash rich and loaded.  

 

 

If people bought a house for sod all 30-40 years ago which is now worth £1million, they have absolutely no right to bleat about being 'not cash rich'. They would be swimming in wealth in under a week if they took a trip down to Foxtons. Could buy an even better house 10 miles outside of London and still have plenty to throw around until they push up daisies. 

  • Confused 1
16 minutes ago, Humdinger said:

If people bought a house for sod all 30-40 years ago which is now worth £1million, they have absolutely no right to bleat about being 'not cash rich'. They would be swimming in wealth in under a week if they took a trip down to Foxtons. Could buy an even better house 10 miles outside of London and still have plenty to throw around until they push up daisies. 

And your point is, oh you don't have one. Why do you expect people who have lived their lives here to move and become cash rich as a result. What you clearly seem to miss/ignore is that house prices outside London are just as expensive, unless you decide to really downsize to and buy in a run down area. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
8 minutes ago, jazzer said:

And your point is, oh you don't have one. Why do you expect people who have lived their lives here to move and become cash rich as a result. What you clearly seem to miss/ignore is that house prices outside London are just as expensive, unless you decide to really downsize to and buy in a run down area. 

You are stubbornly choosing to ignore my point, which is a very valid one. House prices outside of London are not just as expensive. Lets not be silly now. 

Calm down calm down.  I can quote that (for younger Readers the three scousers/Harry Enfield and Friends) as I once lived in Liverpool and whilst having a spat with a neighbour a local in a shell suit intervened to try and sort out our differences.  No it wasn't a mushroom induced dream, but it was the 1980s.

You are both right.  Those of us who moved here three decades ago had fairly modest salaries and neighbours and never expected the property market would get silly, particularly as the market was depressed for almost ten years.  People like me are still very careful with our money, which goes back to my early days of boozing using pocket money and a paper round, and going through higher education without a massive debt.  It is me you hear near Gail's in the Village talking about needing to remortgage the house to eat there.

But the demographics have changed and newbies buying (and renting?) in the area are a very different beast, with more expendable income even after paying for a subterranean extension and private education for the kids, and are probably less likely to check the prices in Gail's

There's a more serious conversation about demographics, wealth and the like.  I expect that that generations younger than me are more happy to splash the cash on frivolous things like takeaways.....  Maybe I am just a dinosaur 😀

 

 

 

Edited by malumbu
19 hours ago, jazzer said:

All depends where you may want to move too. Even moving to the NE is now expensive, so No I'm not ignoring your point, but rather highlighting that prices have significantly risen here from what they were 30 - 40 years ago, NO we ain't cash rich. 

House prices in Dulwich rose faster than anywhere else in England from 1995 to 2017 - double the average increase even in London (see attached).

If you were lucky or wise enough to have bought property here 20 or 30 years ago,  the money you’ve made  will now buy you a much better house than you could have bought at the time in any other area.  

IMG_3313.png

Edited by AlexandHelenC
Typo
22 minutes ago, AlexandHelenC said:

 the money you’ve made  will now buy you a much better house than you could have bought at the time in any other area.

You haven't actually made any money till you have sold - and why should you if you are happy where you are living? You could of course (I wouldn't advise it) re-mortgage to release equity, but to do so to buy expensive bread is probably a false economy. Asset rich, cash poor is a very real thing, and it still means living as if you're cash poor. Yes, investing in property in ED 30 years ago was a good property investment, but buying a house in ED 30 years ago and still living in that house gains you nothing, except in theory.

  • Thanks 1
On 15/05/2023 at 08:28, ken78 said:

looks like they are doing both as you can still order a takeaway 

https://www.just-eat.co.uk/restaurants-jaflong-tandoori-east-dulwich-se22/menu 


yes - delivery/ collection only for Jaflong https://jaflongtakeaway.co.uk

The pizza joint is now open too. Not tried it yet; delivery/ collection. Opened in the last 10 days or so. Hope they do ok

https://orders.thepizzajoint.co.uk/

 

  • 4 weeks later...

Peckham Arches has really good, new, BBQ-based food. Went on a Friday night - brought the kids along - outdoor eating with lively vibe - 2for1 cocktails before 7pm (I think, don't quote me on that) - good food with big portions - really enjoyed it! https://peckhamarches.com/ 

  • Like 1
55 minutes ago, teddyboy23 said:

Grove Vale cafe is going to be a Thai restaurant

Good luck to them, GV is a dead spot at night, even the pub is empty during the week.  There used to be a very good Thai in Melbourne Grove but it didn’t last.   

If it’s a decent Thai I don’t think it matters that Grove Vale is quiet at night. 
A good Thai or Vietnamese or other South East Asian is so needed so people will come and it’ll do really well on take aways… if it’s any cop and authentic.

Fingers Crossed 

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...