Jump to content

Recommended Posts

From nothing more than my own observations - it seems that new properties are coming onto the market a lot quicker than existing ones are selling. It seems to have been very slow for many months now. Perhaps it'll pick up again in the spring?

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SebsC Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Wow, 2 bed house on Silvester Road just been

> put

> > on the market for ?1.2 million!! Crazy!

> >

> >

> >

> http://www.zoopla.co.uk/for-sale/details/35897911?

>

> >

> search_identifier=4f77c90daf70733cb3cc8550836a2354

>

>

>

> That's a beautiful house though, judging by the

> pictures .....


And the square footage listed on the floor plan is about double what you'd expect for a 2 bed place. Limited market I suspect - most people would be expecting a family home for that money. I see it more as a place for a rather cool (and wealthy!)couple who do a lot of entertaining and have no desire to have kids. Am just not sure how many people like that would want to live as far out as East Dulwich.

We had our ground floor flat on underhill valued in the spring last year by Foxtons, it was basically double what we paid in 2007.. we were tempted to sell and move out of the area to somewhere cheaper and get a house. But when we factored in the cost of moving and the fact we would use up all the equity on a new home much further out (which would end up myself paying more to travel in for work as it would be too far to cycle) And also leave an area where most of our friends (and our lovely neighbours) and some family live, and where we love all the local amenities, we decided against it. There's no way we could afford to buy here again, even with the equity from our flat ...or even our own flat if we came across it now.

But having seen that some properties that went up for sale at that time we had the valuation still haven't sold all these months further on has made wonder if properties are being overvalued.

I have to say, I was impressed by Foxtons, I thought we might be badgered about making our mind up to sell after we asked them around, but we didn't hear a peep until 6 months later when someone rang to ask if we were still thinking of selling at some point.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...