Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Evolverx8 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dulwich Estate said no to a McD's but I agree

> better than a pub which was rubbish in modern day

> standards and the buildings a crap one so it

> should come down.


And yet they'd rather have a derelict pub than a fast food outlet.


McDonalds on Westhorne Avenue I believe uses a former pub.


I was told both McD's and Tesco have expressed serious interest in the site in the past but were turned down flat by the Dulwich Estate - by a neighbour but one who is very up on local happenings (we live close to the Grove) - and the current plan is residential with some small retail.
Leaving the building effectively derelict (even if 'boarded-up' with sheet steel) will make the case for complete demolition simpler. Its position (with garden and parking) and near a school with a boarding house and thus parents visiting who weren't local could well have made it a viable 'pub with rooms' - for longer-term visitors to Dulwich (the route the Dog is taking) - although the worry was that the estate (where its drop-in punters in the old days came from) would have given the wrong tone to a more up-market establishment. But I do feel its very sad to see the 'big' local pubs ruined or closed - most in the Dulwich Estate portfolio.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If it's a McD's, I'm going to be sent out every

> Saturday morning for a McSausage Muffin + hash

> brown run. Let's hope it doesn't happen.



Why would you be sent there when you live a 5 minute walk from a Maccas?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It won't be a McDonalds. If it does I will

> personally burn it to the ground.



Haha, you're the main reason I'd love it to become a McDonald's. The thought of your sheer horror and disgust makes me chuckle.

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi EdButler,

TfL say they have final draft plans ready to proceed with WHEN the land/money is provided by any new development there.

The plans involve taking some of the existing land, widening the road a little to enable a new traffic island in the middle so the crossing on that western arm would be a two-stage pedestrian crossing. Or at least that's what they're proposing.


My hunch would be 2-4 years time.


We could seek to pseed this up by agreeing with the Dulwich Estate and getting some devlovled TfL funding from LIP but I doubt the administration or officers would be keen to take this approach - it would be swapping speed <12months for circa ?50,000 of TfL Southwark would never see in the future.

But I can ask.

It seems really wrong to me that TFL can not do something for people's safety if they have responsibility for it. Why should the developer chip in, they don't own the road?


And why is it down to TFL as opposed to Southwark highways? I've never quite gotten my head around who is responsible for what.

If it's to be a MacD's, with all the associated litter, carmageddon hell, obesity, the destruction of a nice old building, the loss of a pub, garish neon lighting and apple pies that burn the roof of your mouth, as far as I'm concerned they can pay for attendants to give us piggy backs over the road

Hi Otta,

I agree. But the south circular is a TfL road and so they are the highway authority for this junction.


Relinquishing some of the land for a wider road allowing a pedestrian island other than via a Compulsory Purchase Order will need the cooperation of the Dulwich Estate as freeholder and the leaseholder.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Our camera caught two folks doing this. One of them led me to believe the delivery driver was in on it as he left the package in a very odd place that the thief (who arrived about 10 minutes after from a direction where he could not have seen where the driver left it) went straight to it and took it - but he then dumped it halfway down the next road as clearly packets of freeze-dried food for a DofE award wasn't to his liking (karma sucks!). The second time a guy pulled his bike up in broad daylight, walked down to our door, opened the box, threw the empty box down and stuffed what he had found in his backpack and brazenly waved at the camera and then cycled off. Police asked us to upload his picture but we never heard anything back.
    • I hear that Landells Road has had a spate of parcels being taken,
    • In the 1960s my husband went to a private day school, Although he was a bright child having won a couple of scholarships to other private schools, his father chose this particular one. He went from 11 - 14 years and left as unhappy with the set up which was based on ethnicity. All boys with both parents English were placed in the A stream regardless of academic ability, Boys with an Irish background were placed in B stream. All others were C streamed - this included boys with a Black or Asian  background, mixed race or mixed European background. His schooldays came to an end when he wished to learn Latin and he was told that no boy in C stream could participate in this subject. His father (not English) was very upset at this and withdrew him from the school and sent him  to a country boarding school.  The experiences he had with his schooling culminated in a breakdown of his mental health and several months in Maudsley. He had low self esteem and it took several decades for him to understand that it was the school system and not his ability which had failed him
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...