Jump to content

Recommended Posts

implicit in your post is an attraction for Mick Mac tho', PGC - care to deny or confirm?


The people I have had the largest barneys with on here are often people I have gone on to find common ground with ( * wipes a tear at the memory of NatashaD *)


I'm always glad when Louisa comes back a-postin' after an absence, but we often diagree on both content and approach.

There is one on here who has posted stuff about a subject which it seemed clear to me he could not have experienced personally (through the way he was writing), has then PMd very offensively to me because he did not like my point of view, and yet people I have met who have met him say he's reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally nice.

Interesting innit, people's personas on here and how they differ in real life.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've been musing over who's my most opposite

> poster and have concluded that it's MickMac.

>

> Eg

>

> Celtic / Rangers

>

> Smoking ban is best thing to happen / bring back

> smoking in pubs

>

> ...ginger hair (v bad) / well really

>

>

> Who are yours?



Ah - PGC - I was only jesting about the red hair - I have a 3 year old daughter who has the brightest orange hair, on a sunny day you can see her for miles - and its very very nice.

Smoking - I have always had rather bad asthma - so thats the reason for that one.

But Rangers - that I cannot overcome...no seriously I like a bit of banter and have a couple of rangers fans as friends - (although we don't speak often, just by text after old firm games).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...