Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If it's something that meant that much to you ("you" in general, not YOU), you'd find the ?7. And if you really really couldn't afford it, then you have the option to go to one which doesn't charge, so everyone's a winner.


Or Lambeth just don't have any fireworks, that's the other option.




I bet any money that the only reason Blackheath is free is because there is absolutely no way they could fence it off and stop people from seeing it.

I kind of agree with echo, that a free event can have more of a community feel and focus. I've been to the

last 15 or so Brockwell Park displays and there certainly has been a sense of community there, a shared enjoyment of a an old tradition, ritual, a simple pleasure really. However in these times of austerity, I don't believe local councils should provide a free display. Community events are important for our wellbeing, I do get that, but not at the expense of other crucial local services.

That said, I question the wisdom of putting on the kind of event that took place on Wednesday night. It wasn't family friendly having the display starting at 8:30pm. I have a nine year old, and it was borderline too late for him on a school night, so I wonder how younger children fared. It was horribly chaotic from 7pm onwards, very crowded and poorly organised. So although the firework display was wonderful, the overall experience for me was disappointing. I'd rather pay a fiver for the fireworks only, and forget all the other nonsense, I mean really, is there any need for a fun fair?

Plus, beautiful Brockwell Park was turned into a mud bath, and I think it's a bad idea to have big events over the Autumn and Winter months, when the ground is already damp and wet. It will take months to recover and it's a huge shame given how much Heritage Lottery money has already been spent on improving the park.

But it's meant to be a firework display, not a funfair.


My daughter went there with her friends, got in early, but sounds like they were fed up with waiting around and her trainers tell the story of the park being a mud bath. She had no money to spend on other things and when the fireworks were nearly over they all managed to get out of the park safely.

I don't mind paying a reasonable price and it was free for the kids.

But surprisingly it was far more crowded than in the years before.

Our overall experience wasn't great, it felt like waiting for the fireworks for an hour

(last entry 7.30) and it was just not a family event anymore.

Bit the lord of lightening and the fireworks were great!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...