Jump to content

Recommended Posts

La Piba and I are trying to work out if underfloor heating should be left on the whole time or controlled by thermostat.


I've scoured on line only to find all advice utterly contradictory, often in the same piece of advice, so hoping the brainy bods of the forum are better than that.


It's only in the open plan area of the house, kitchen/living room/hall, about 1600 sq ft. with 3 statted control zones.

Floor is well insulated and surface is limestone tile, heats up nice and quick and conducts well. probably too much glass, but all triple glazed, and no draughts at all (airtight house).


Someone said this being the case keep your heating on 24 hours at 16 degrees. But does that heat up the room to more than that, is it somehow cumulative, as 16 degrees sounds bloody chilly to me?

There would be other sources of heat to bring the room(s) up to a higher temp though.


Solar - sun shining in through windows (granted a rarity where you are)

Radiation - from human bodies and lighting

Electric - tvs, computers, fridge, oven etc etc


In an airtight house I'd imagine they'd all add another 4 degrees which would keep you at a balmy 20 degrees?


Not to mention the odd time you light the wood burner.

haven't got the wood burner in that room yet, the other one is not going to add enough.

Granted when the sun is shining it gets roasting even if the outside temp is cold, but it can go months at a time without sun in the winter.


I'm not convinced the other things will provide enough heat as it's a vaulted ceiling and double heighted in the hall so we;re talking alot of air to heat with one telly.


I reckon thermostats may have to be the way forward then, at least until we get the burner installed.


Cheers for the feedback D_C, I knew the forum wouldn't let me down.

I'm also struggling with this one. I've got electric u/f in a rear ground floor garden extension under sandstone tiles. The problem is that it's like a very slow radiator and takes 24 to 26 hours to warm up the room to a reasonable temp (if it's cold outside) and then you have to keep the fucker on all the time. I cant work out if its cheaper to keep it on all the time at a lower temp than the spike to warm it up each weekend.

We have similar, under limestone tiles (and a small wooden area in the dining area of the kitchen). Three "sectors", all controlled by separate sensors. We have it on thermostat, to heat up the space to 20 degrees morning (comes on at about 5:30am, off at 9:30) and evening (4:30 till 9:30ish). In between those times it's set at 17, and it's only on the very coldest days in winter that it comes on outside of the standard times.


Same goes for our central heating. I never switch either off during the year.


Best decision we made when we refurbished our house. Our underfloor is electric and initially I was worried that our energy bills would increase - actually we have found completely the opposite, after a year of paying the same monthly direct debit as before the heating was installed we were significantly in credit.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> haven't got the wood burner in that room yet, the

> other one is not going to add enough.

> Granted when the sun is shining it gets roasting

> even if the outside temp is cold, but it can go

> months at a time without sun in the winter.

>


Jeez - where do you live!

Intereting pickle.


we also have solar thermal, which meant we barely swtiched the gas on during the summer when you don't need to anyway, but of course in the winter means it probably won't be much use, though even with little sunlight it's probably enough for the underfloor.


It's looking like we use about a third of a tank of gas a year on current experience, that's about ?650 for heating, hot water and cooking. That's cheaper than it was in london which was a about a quarter of the size this place, (the london flat, not london, a quarter of the size of rosbercon would probably be an MP's duck house) but hard to say as we only caught the tail end of a mild winter.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm also struggling with this one. I've got

> electric u/f in a rear ground floor garden

> extension under sandstone tiles. The problem is

> that it's like a very slow radiator and takes 24

> to 26 hours to warm up the room to a reasonable

> temp (if it's cold outside) and then you have to

> keep the @#$%& on all the time. I cant work out

> if its cheaper to keep it on all the time at a

> lower temp than the spike to warm it up each

> weekend.


Any reason why you went for electric MrB?...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...