Jump to content

Go on... sell me 2 bed+ flat in East Dulwich for dirt cheap???


Recommended Posts

MattOliver Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 26 year old resident... just dawned on myself and

> my girlfriend that after the recent boom in prices

> we will be renting forever.


I get your drift but whilst its harder than ever to get on the ladder at 26 years old, back in 2001 I couldn't either. Even with a second similar income. And at that time ED was much more affordable and not the area it is now.


You can get bitter about it or if it really matters to you to be able to buy here, work out a way of earning more money than you are at present. At 26 your income will rise for sure....or start a business....there are ways and means if you really want it and are motivated to get there.


Or move to an area thats like how ED was to me when I bought here ten years ago? Penge is your friend and offers similar value.


Edit: 2001 I couldnt...2002 prices ran away from me....2004 I could finally.....but only after moving jobs

We bought in East Dulwich in our late 20s, and like others it was because it was more affordable than other areas at the time. Brockley, Penge, Catford, even parts of Forest Hill are cheaper and bound to be a good investment in the long run.
Of course everything's got harder, but it's a similar principle, surely? I appreciate a one bedroom flat in Catford isn't what most people dream of, but the same time, probably attainable for most young professionals living as a couple.

How do people who get enough for a flat In catford move on to buy a house


The complacency of SOME of the already purchased is what's astonishing. The principle isn't what it was ten years ago


Just sit down and do the sums. Give yourself a decent ish family income. Buy the flat in undesirable part of London and then what? You think your income will rise enough to buy a house, as it has done in the past? Dreeeeeeaming


Mrben suggests there are ways. And of course there are a few ways. But not open to general, salaried families. Not every can or should become entrepreneurs

"It's also extraordinary how often people on here that got on the housing ladder an aeon ago sow seeds of wisdom, wisdom won by (essentially) their good fortune to be born earlier. "Hey, I couldn't afford Wandsworth in 1998, so I bought in East Dulwich, what's the problem with living in a shoe, the old lady did"."


You're missing the point. Property in London has got proportionately more expensive because of rising demand and static supply, and inner London even more so because demand for the 'urban' life has outstripped that for the 'suburban'. What is stopping people (on even pretty good incomes) from buying in places like ED is people with even more money stumping up for houses, not people who bought years ago when it was cheaper. It may be an unpleasant fact to face when you're 26 and looking for urban cool but affordable places now are not ED, nor even Catford, but Ilford, or Bexleyheath, for example. It might not seem fair, but until we start building (maybe in some ED back gardens?) that's the way it is.

miga - apology not necessary... I guess I agree with bits of what both you and DaveR say. Most of us have to compromise when buying somewhere, it was the case 10-15 years ago and it's still the case now. But the compromises you might have to make these days might be a little less palatable, and the level of earnings you need to buy anything at all is dangerously high.


SJ - I'd suggest the move from the one bed flat in Catford to a family home would probbaly have to be something along the lines a move out to Essex or North Kent... and I'm not saying that's all fine and dandy... but people on a reasonable household income should still be able find a way..

RE Income increasing.


Between 25 - 30, my income did go up by about ?11k. It's barely moved in the last 5 or 6 years, and that ain't gonna change anytime soon.


At the same time we've had kids, so my wife's income has halved.


We've got a fingernail hold on the bottom of the ladder only because my father in law helped up with a deposit and because of the help to by scheme (which came with SHIT mortgage deal).


Without our parents dying and leaving stuff to us, we will never afford anything else in London.


And we live in Penge, which is comparable to Catford price wise.

It's not all just 'luck' If you were brave you could get a deal in the not so distant past of 2009ish but most people didn't want to. Ditto 1991-95 for the older ones (or mid/late 70s for the even older). Where we are sitting now most non-owners looking to buy in SE22 need a big salary job or parental help or on a macro-level some decent general inflation or a crash or ...neither of which look especially likely in the short to medium term. But those of us who sat in unsellable flats that at halved in value in a year in 1991 do remember something very different.......

"But it seems that we agree that options for young people in terms of affordability in (very, very loosely) central London are bloody awful, in a way that is very different to even a decade ago."


I definitely agree with that, but one of the reasons for it is just that London appears to keep on getting more desirable and (in aggregate, and comparatively) richer, whilst not really increasing the density of population in the most popular bit i.e. Inner London.. My comment about building in back gardens was only partly tongue in cheek - there is a thread on that topic where someone says 'what we love about this area is the space, and peace and quiet etc." Well, fair enough, but that comes at a cost.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's not all just 'luck' If you were brave you

> could get a deal in the not so distant past of

> 2009ish but most people didn't want to. Ditto

> 1991-95 for the older ones (or mid/late 70s for

> the even older). Where we are sitting now most

> non-owners looking to buy in SE22 need a big

> salary job or parental help or on a macro-level

> some decent general inflation or a crash or

> ...neither of which look especially likely in the

> short to medium term.


This. I said as much on one of the property threads and got shot down by frustrated sheep buyers in 2014 lamenting the crazy prices. I argued that many of those who were lucky enough to have the means to buy in 2009-2011 didn't through fear.


I wont be popular for saying this but surely we're all ultimately responsible for the choices we make in life, whether it's career (and salary), timing of a house purchase whatever. That's not to say that the current situation isn't messed up, inequitable and out of kilter for people on average salaries - it clearly is.


But luck you cant do much about, personal choices you can. And the implications of the choices we make often last a lifetime....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...