Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And before that, The New Hamlet Inn. Only went there a handful of times before it became The Vale. For a period around 2003/04 it was a regular Friday/Saturday night venue for a bunch of us (start at The CPT then head down there before grabbing a wrap roll from Yilmaz then often heading back to The CPT (upstairs).


But despite putting ?100+ behind their bar EVERY time I went in there (God, to have that money to spend now...), never doing any drugs in there (honstly), and never getting in any scraps, the owner still looked at me like I was something unpleasant he'd trodden in. Eventually you just think maybe your money would be better spent elsewhere.


Plus the music changed from fun stuff to dance to (Hey Ya) to stuff I wasn't remotely in to, and the crowds dwindled, and other places got later licenses so it wasn't the only local option after 11pm.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Antic is a 'chain' of 37 pubs with different

> > names

> >

> > Walkabout has 32 Walkabouts...

> >

> > ...you see the difference? No?

>

> But a 'chain' is still a chain, right? I was

> merely pointing out in reply to you that some

> decent poubs are chain pubs.



No it's not, at all. a branded chain with all the same named pubs, menus, etc and aimed at delivering the same experience to people who want the security of a brand they know is very different to a pubco that owns a bunch of different pubs with different names (although some pub cos standardise some of the offering).

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn't it one of the places the 'Great Train

> Robbers' met to plan their escapade?



Legend has it that the robbers celebrated their success with a drink in East Dulwich at The Cherry Tree pub.


I believe this to be just an urban myth.


DulwichFox

Millhaven Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently the former owners of The Adventure Bar

> (Lordship Lane) are the new owners of The Cheery

> Tree.



Let's hope it changes from The Not Very Cheery Tree to The Cheery Tree :))


Do the Adventure Bar people also own this Australian (?) chain then, or is that a franchise?

Millhaven Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

>

>

> >

> > Do the Adventure Bar people also own this

> > Australian (?) chain then, or is that a

> franchise?

>

> Nah, they are nothing to do with Walkabout.



So does anybody have some actual link to a written source which will tell us without a doubt who has bought The Cherry Tree?


I'm beginning to think the Not Very Cheery owners are going to stay there after all! :)) and :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...