Jump to content

Are there any material differences between Labour and the Tories?


Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If only people would stop voting red to avoid

> blue, and vice versa and actually just take the

> plunge and vote for the party they actually think

> are best, we might finally move away from these

> muppets.



Interesting. Do you really think that is what the problem is? I always thought the problem lay with the ones that don't bother voting at all. These past two or three elections I have almost yearned for an benign dictatorship. A fantasy of course, but I hate the way things are now and feel totally disengaged with this country's political landscape.

Well yes, if lots of non voters voted that would make a huge difference to. But I do believe that loads of people like the idea of, say, The Green Party, but when it comes down to it they go for red or blue because they're trying to keep the other one out.
That's not going to happen until we get proportional representation. Coz that means you vote for the party you believe in. First past the post only works with two parties. We now have at least 5 in most places. The result is therefore totally unpreditable in many cases.

"democracy is over-rated"


the strength of democracy is stability, brought about not in spite of the lack of room for political manoeuvre endemic to appealing to the lowest common denominator and appeasing short term goals with tinkering, but because of it.


It does come at the const of basically annoying ALL of the electorate.


The inherent deanger is of course that it can turn people off the political process giving more sway to those who DO engage.


Given a choice between the paralysis of proportional representation and the sine wave toing and froing of two party systems, I'm afraid i can't be arsed to decide ;)


The problem with benevolent dictatorship (and i know it was mostly tongue in cheek) is that it's entirely dependendent on the continued benevolence of the rul(er/ing clique) and of course succession is a fraught business.


Plus, you know, trading in a sense of powerlesness in a political system that can't do too much harm, to a sense of powerlessness in a political system that can do what it wants....


All that said the Chinese seem to have been making a pretty good stab at it for the last 30 years or so, though they've solved the stability and succession issues by creating a two faction system where they hand over power every 10 years....uncanny :D

I don't like sneering at anyone . It's a very metroplitan habit which I do my best to avoid (although it's hard with hypocritical Guardianistas for example)


So all white Van drivesr are UKIP voters? You're generalising and stereotyping and being very metropilitan....*that* particular one didn't even vote for example

Oh come on Quids, I know you think I'm guilty of lazy social media stuff (I am at times), but don't claim that you're above stereotyping.


The thread that you started about that whole episode was called something like "what Labour really think of white working classes". That means that YOU saw that photo of a white van and an England flag (and a West Ham flag), and YOU immediately pictured white working class, and I'm guessing copy of the Sun.


And that is perfectly normal, I'm not attacking you for it, but you're not above it.

Problem with current democracy


"The impact of the lack of reform is felt by the public. People need better services, have higher expectations, but as any politician can tell you, they don?t want to pay more for them. So the absence of reform, particularly in an era of tight budgets, is immensely challenging. Thus you have the curious paradox of modern leadership: There has to be reform to satisfy rising public demands, but the public can be easily mobilized to oppose those reforms. Therefore politicians often back off the change, which then increases voters? disillusionment with the political process."



From a very good article in ny times today. By... Erm... Blair

But yeah, it's no great revelation that people say 'ooh yeah i'd pay more for better serivces' and then vote with their pocket....EVERY....TIME....


and it's not getting better in this downloads for free, tax payers not citizens, rights not responsiblities, cake and eat it culture of ours.


anyway, thanks for your great insight blair, now please, once and for all, retire from the public eye with whatever grace you may have left (a clue....none...espeecially after *that* card)


 

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Problem with current democracy

>

> "The impact of the lack of reform is felt by the

> public. People need better services, have higher

> expectations, but as any politician can tell you,

> they don?t want to pay more for them. So the

> absence of reform, particularly in an era of tight

> budgets, is immensely challenging. Thus you have

> the curious paradox of modern leadership: There

> has to be reform to satisfy rising public demands,

> but the public can be easily mobilized to oppose

> those reforms. Therefore politicians often back

> off the change, which then increases voters?

> disillusionment with the political process."

>

>

> From a very good article in ny times today. By...

> Erm... Blair


And a very tory position, to some degree. Vested interests of all sorts fight reform of public services or changing how, who and what they deliver in the 21st Century World with its challenges and demographics. We need new solutions not just more money (and their ain't enough anyway without a massive across the board hike in taxes).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Two local ‘High Streets for People’ events happening today: - Southwark celebrates High Streets for People On Saturday 21 June, Southwark Council is bringing residents, families, communities and businesses together to celebrate our High Streets. On Bellenden Road, Peckham, there will be a community event from 11am to 4pm with children’s games, face-painting, live music including a samba band and DJs, food from local businesses, cycling activities and much more. The road will be temporarily shut to vehicles between Danby Street and Choumert Road from 7am to 7pm, with buses diverted during this time to make space for community and family activities. Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets and Waste, said: “What a great way to celebrate the first day of Summer! Streets for People is about putting people first — making our neighbourhoods places where communities can connect, businesses can thrive, and everyone can enjoy cleaner air and safer streets.” Partners in the event include Bellenden Road businesses, London Play, Peddle my Wheels, JoyRiders, Community Cycleworks, the London Samba Band, OurBike, Poetic Unity. North Cross Road market will also be extended on Saturday 21 June, with extra traders taking part. Vehicle access will be restricted up to Lacon Road between 8am and 5pm to accommodate this. Local communities are also organising a number of play streets and street parties to mark the start of summer. The council has approved 18 road closures in June and July, allowing communities to enjoy their streets without traffic for the day. All these activities support Southwark’s Streets for People strategy, which seeks to make streets across the borough cleaner, greener, safer and more welcoming.  Investments are being made in walking and cycling routes, improved air quality, and creating more space for community use. Find out more at www.southwark.gov.uk/highstreetsforpeople As part of its commitment to do something each year that brings residents, community groups and businesses together to take climate action, Southwark Council has also arranged a number of free events as part of London Climate Action Week. You can view the full list of events at www.southwark.gov.uk/climate-week
    • It does seem a common business strategy these days. River Island has just announced a similar restructuring: closing 33 shops and demanding that the landlords of a further 71 locations take a haircut. 
    • If anyone has any spare tickets for Crystal Palace on Sunday let me know!
    • The tenant's business has already failed. If the landlord doesn't accept it, they can have a vacant property, stand in the queue of creditors, and get paid little or nothing. It's a gamble that the restructuring will work and the tenant will start paying rent again. Commercial properties are often hard to let. 🤷
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...