Jump to content

Recommended Posts

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know I shouldn't bite

>

> But

>

> Out of order how exactly?



I know I shouldn't bite? What am I a troll??!


It's all about how you word things. And how you speak to people. And how rude you are.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The thread IS about things in the past.


Which is exactly why I picked up Strafer on his comments about the items I listed. Ironic that this the thread is about things you just never "got" , for one I dont get his "humour"

Exactly. SJ made a joke, that's all ot was. It was a bit of a crap joke to be fair, but I think you took opffence where none was meant, and AqM took the opportunity to get involved because she clearly thinks SJ was wronged her somewhere.


It was not out of order, it was just misunderstood (and not very funny - sorry SJ).

totally spot on Otta - it WAS a lame joke but entirely well-intentioned


I just thought the list was liek a mini time caspule so I made the lame joke and then made an Arsenal reference to show it was one Arsenal fan joshing another. No idea why AQ got quite so cross

If that had been me or fox we would have been accused of trolling and stirring up the cauldron, even if it had been a misunderstood joke. I do agree however, I don't think StraferJack can take the hit on this one for anything other than a bad attempt at humour which backfired and caused bandwagon jumping. I do love this forum sometimes.


Louisa.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and AqM took

> the opportunity to get involved because she

> clearly thinks SJ was wronged her somewhe



Not true Otta. Can't ever remember being wronged by SJ. Just didn't agree with him. That's all.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fair enough. But I can't understand what you think

> he said that was "out of order". But anyway,

> nothing more to see here.



It didn't come across as a joke to me in the first place and subsequent comments came across as trying to stir up a reaction from Parkdrive and start an argument.


We all have different ways of seeing things & that's how I saw it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...