Jump to content

I'm currently out of the office and will have....


Recommended Posts

I usually say I have limited access, so no-one can assume automatically I'll service their enquiries.

That way, if I'm keeping an eye open, I can pick / choose / divert as I see fit.

I rarely totally ignore work for an entire week unless I'm somewhere that physically prevents comms.

But I'm not gonna tell everyone at work that.

I am at home and will have limited access because vodafone's coverage is sh*t and my blackberry only connects in random 5 minute windows.


(also limited access might mean "I'm checking every couple of hours in breaks between meetings but might not be able to respond immediately. Or I'm on and off planes so won't get them all the time)



Maj. Major Major Major:

Sergeant, from now on, I don't want anyone to come in and see me while I'm in my office. Is that clear?


First Sgt. Towser:

Yes, sir. What do I say to people who want to come in and see you while you're in your office?


Maj. Major Major Major:

Tell them I'm in and ask them to wait.


First Sgt. Towser:

For how long?


Maj. Major Major Major:

Until I've left.


First Sgt. Towser:

And then what do I do with them?


Maj. Major Major Major:

I don't care.


First Sgt. Towser:

May I send people in to see you after you've left?


Maj. Major Major Major:

Yes.


First Sgt. Towser:

You won't be here then, will you?


Maj. Major Major Major:

No.


First Sgt. Towser:

I see, sir. Will that be all?


Maj. Major Major Major:

Also, Sergeant, I don't want you coming in while I'm in my office asking me if there's

anything you can do for me. Is that clear?


First Sgt. Towser: Yes, sir.

When should I come in your office and ask if there's anything I can do for you?


Maj. Major Major Major:

When I'm not there.


First Sgt. Towser:

What do I do then?


Maj. Major Major Major:

Whatever has to be done.


First Sgt. Towser:

Yes, sir.




DulwichFox

Some people at work have been using a facility which, when you e-mail them a notice comes up telling you when they are free. I purposely do not want to use it because I don't want people to know when I'm free so that they can pester me and then I won't be free. Being 'free' means this is the only time I've got to actually get on and do some actual work......

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> .....limited access to emails.

>

> Is something I see every day on auto replies. And

> it's bollocks. Unless your sailing to St Kilda or

> hiking round the remote alps everyone now has a

> smartphone,tablet,laptop. You're reading your

> email!

>

> Why not just be honest and say you're on holiday

> and don't want to be interrupted? Or not say it at

> all?

>

> We're stil adapting to the new world it seems....


I'm of the opinion that if you can afford to employ someone to say they have 'limited access to emails blah etc' whilst sailing round St. Kinda or hiking in the Alps then you're employing too many staff. The work still needs to be done and no-one is indispensable.


Edited for grammar :p

Not what I meant Lady D. Of course people can have time off to do those things, it was the fact that things can't be done without them being there (or the implication of that by them having "limited" access to emails. No-one is that important that decisions cannot be taken by others in their absence. Presuming that something needs to happen whilst they are off.


Holidays? 5 minutes for lunch would be nice. Having too little staff is just as bad as having too many.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...