Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Fox - as has been mentioned more than once - you are talking about the US recipe. The UK recipe is very different. Also, the people who pay a premium for organic, locally sourced yada yada generally don't eat in McDonald's. You've missed the mark...

According to the McDonalds UK website, ingredients for fries are as follows:


Potatoes, Vegetable Oil (Sunflower, Rapeseed), Dextrose (only added at beginning of the potato season).

Prepared in the restaurants using a non-hydrogenated vegetable oil.

Salt is added after cooking.


http://www.mcdonalds.co.uk/ukhome/product_nutrition.sides.44.mcdonalds-fries.html

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > My original post was just to highlight that

> 17-19 were used to produce French Fries..

>

> 18 is citric acid. Prime component of lemon

> juice. What's your issue with that?


Nothing at all. But I can make chips at home without using lemon Juice..


DulwichFox

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Nothing at all. But I can make chips at home

> without using lemon Juice..

>

> I've no doubt you can. But can you make 200 tonne

> of them?


FFS..


I'm going to have a nice soak in my tub... Boil my head.. then off out to meet my public..


Hopefully find someone to have a sensible conversation with.


Anyone with a mental age of 8 should do after spending time here.


DF

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm going to have a nice soak in my tub... Boil my head.. then off out to meet my public..

> Hopefully find someone to have a sensible conversation with.

> Anyone with a mental age of 8 should do after spending time here.


Hello, Foxy's off on a flounce.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know people in the country who take home

> anything they run over and cook it for their

> families because they don't want the animal to

> have died in vain. Ethics are tougher in the

> country apparently.


I have always thought of that as an argument of convenience somewhat.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I know people in the country who take home

> > anything they run over and cook it for their

> > families because they don't want the animal to

> > have died in vain. Ethics are tougher in the

> > country apparently.

>

> I have always thought of that as an argument of

> convenience somewhat.


Personally I thought it was revolting. One friend became such an enthusiast she would sit in her car idling the engine waiting for something to step out. The bloodlust became clear when her family refused to eat it and she carried on.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fox - as has been mentioned more than once - you

> are talking about the US recipe. The UK recipe is

> very different. Also, the people who pay a premium

> for organic, locally sourced yada yada generally

> don't eat in McDonald's. You've missed the mark...


Not to mention the fact, that, to my knowledge, none of the people on here are abject morons.


Fox, do you really think any of us thinks that McDonalds food is good for us? I like good food, but sometimes I eat a Snickers, and I know it's shit, but I am more than ok with that. Beer's bad for you. Smoking's bad for you. Too much cheese is bad for you. But we drink, smoke, eat fondue and go see the personal trainer. I am entirely at peace with the cognitive dissonance.


Oh. And it's not even the bloody UK recipe anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • How on earth can someone like this be allowed to continue as a solicitor? Can't be just be struck off, or the equivalent?
    • There are no road works in front of Cod fellas and yesterday when I requested a stop there the driver went straight past and never stopped untill Avondale Riss. As cars have to stop because of the lights why can busses not do this? 1 minute Bloodly mindedness.
    • These are the smokeless fuels you can burn on a open fireplace in Southwark: https://smokecontrol.defra.gov.uk/fuels-php/england/ https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/environment/air-quality/reduce-air-pollution/reduce-smoke
    • Thanks all, our hope was (despite the diminishing estate) he would get on with it.  Progress is glacial, it's been two years since probate was granted, that's two cold and damp winters with no heating, and not surprisingly a pipe burst. He's blames the issues on the estate agent, who separately had a dispute with him, he had a wobbly when one of the beneficiaries spoke to the estate agent.  Separately he said it was the family's fault for letting the property get into a poor condition.  It was dated, but certainly not in poor condition. There are two five star reviews on Google, and five one star: ** WARNING** This solicitor firm has to be one of the worst I have encountered. The solicitor is prehistoric in his practices and will carry out work at his own snails pace, the fax machine he uses gets turned off at 2 pm and its near impossible to get him on the phone. STAY AWAY, YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED, check the solicitors ombudsman, this firm has previous bad practice recorded.   Disgusting under no circumstances use this solicitor.For over 10 years he has not carried out the terms of a Will he has not re-invested money but has retained it.  He writes letters which are pure "Flannel" excuses for doing nothing.  You have been warned   shocking experience, delayed the whole process, told other side solicitors to not contact him as he feels pressured etc. never use.   Not fit for 21st century. No website, no email address, no electronic transfer. Very slow, very little communication.   Was not a pleasant experience dealing with this firm    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...