Jump to content

McDonalds French fries... What's in them... ?


DulwichFox

Recommended Posts

I think canola oil is very similar to rapeseed oil - rapeseed oil being quite posh stuff that has been cold pressed. Contrary to what has been posted above I have always been told that canola/rapeseed it is much healthier than other oils (as Loz states) because it has the lowest saturated fat of any cooking oil... But, you know...I'm sure I've been told varying numbers of eggs I should eat in a week too, so everything in moderation.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > Canola Oil is pretty nasty..

>

> No it's not - it's actually pretty healthy... It does seem to be the subject of one of those fake email scares, though.


Result of an oft-misquoted line from the Godfather; "Leave the gun, bring the Canola."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok let's seperate food hygiene from the equation


If McDonald's sold a product that was at best 'misleading' then they'd be rightly pilloried


But Kebab shops which sells a non-lamb "Lamb Doner" is ok because the sell Shish when you're pissed


Ok, I see. But support that deception and then lash out at new business doing an honest job, because you don't like change/what they might stand for, is all fine and dandy


Tragic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My woman shunned the haggis on Saturday night as she said its full of offal. But she'll happily eat sausages or hot dogs which are all a lot worse in the mystery ingredients department.


As for Maccas I like a quarter pounder with cheese once or twice a year. But immediately after I get a weird high and feel unclean inside. A bit like the MSG buzz after a Mr Lius

Link to comment
Share on other sites

phobic3000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I heard once that McDonalds milkshakes have

> sawdust in them... Urban myth?


Myth, though (if there was such a thing as food-grade sawdust) it might be healthier: the fibre would slow down the sugar absorption, making it lower GI and less stressful on the pancreas, and the displacement of sugar and fat by the sawdust would reduce the calories overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My woman shunned the haggis on Saturday night as

> she said its full of offal. But she'll happily eat

> sausages or hot dogs which are all a lot worse in

> the mystery ingredients department.


You want to do something about that - is it too late to chuck her in for a bandy legged Scots lass whose idea of fine dining is using a wooden fork with her chips?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not Myth..


Saw Dust is formed into pulp 'Celulose' and used extensively in MANY everyday products..


Pepsi


Kellogg


Weight Watchers International


McDonald's




15 Food Companies That Serve You 'Wood'


http://www.thestreet.com/story/11012915/1/cellulose-wood-pulp-never-tasted-so-good.html?cm_ven=outbrain&psv=tscserps&obref=obnetwork




There may be more fibre in your food than you realized.


Burger King, McDonald?s and other fast food companies list in the ingredients of several of their foods,

microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) or ?powdered cellulose? as components of their menu items.

Or, in plain English, wood pulp.


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-03/how-fast-food-providers-beat-inflation-add-wood-pulp-burgers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miga


I too love a good Kebab


But a good Kebab is a rare thing, just don't see why the big guns like KFC & McD's get slated & the local shite mongers get blindsided



But in the world of dirty food, that KFC thing above does have a certain 'sexyness' to it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Saw Dust is formed into pulp 'Celulose' and used extensively in MANY everyday products..


... and then processed further in to cellulose gum. But it's not saw dust then, is it? And possibly never was (wood pieces or chips, perhaps, but not dust).


Anyway, that's like shouting that Sainsburys use wood bark in their hot cross buns. Most of us call it 'cinnamon'. Or a restaurant puts tree sap on their pancakes (Maple syrup). Or tree leaves in their stews and casseroles (bay leaves).


You also find fish bladder or egg in your wine, boiled beetle shells in your soft drinks, cows stomachs in your cheese and horse's hooves in you fruit tart.


And most of those have been in our food for hundreds of years. Hardly the creation of the modern food industry!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is called "Asian Takeaway". Google for peckham

> rye asian takeaway and you'll find it.

>

> They make the naan fresh, individually to order on

> the spot.

>

> There is a juice bar/stand/shack next door, who do

> some rather interesting concoctions.


nom


sometimes i wished i still ate meat,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asset Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Canola oil IS Rapeseed oil



NO It's Not...


People often get confused about the difference between Canola Oil and Rapeseed Oil.

These two plant-based cooking oils, however, are different. Here?s the scoop on both.


Why They Get Mixed-Up: The Origin of Canola

Both canola and rapeseed belong to the cabbage or mustard family.

The plants' flowers both have that characteristic bright yellow colour, and you get oil from both of the seeds by crushing the plants.


That said, they have a couple key genetic differences. Canola was created through plant-breeding in order to get rid of two undesirable components of rapeseed.


Rapeseed oil and canola oil also get mixed up because they can be labeled incorrectly outside of Canada and the United States.


What's the Difference Between Canola and Rapeseed Oils?

In the 1970s canola was created through traditional plant cross-breeding by removing two things found in the rapeseed plant: glucosinolates and erucic acid. Erucic acid was removed because it was believed to be inedible or toxic in high doses. The newly developed plant was renamed "canola" ? a combination of "Canadian" and "Oil" (or ola) to make this difference apparent.


By definition, if a seed is labeled "canola" it has to have less than 30 micromoles of glucosinolates and less than 2% of erucic acid.


Source :- http://www.thekitchn.com/whats-the-difference-between-canola-and-rapeseed-206047


There is so much stuff out there on the subject.. Just have a read..


DulwichFox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But you have to assess whether these persistent drivers are creating more safety issues than diverting emergency vehicles on a longer route and clearly they are not. The fact members of the pro-closure lobby have built their argument on this actually shows how desperate, some would say selfish, they are to have the junction closed and just the way they want it. And unfortunately they seem to have the council over a barrel on something as the council weakly concedes to their position without hesitation. Was this not borne from an FOI that said one of the emergency services confirmed that they had not been consulted on the new DV design that Cllr Leeming then said was actually a mistake by the emergency services - and then it's a case of whether you believe Cllr Leeming or not....and his track record is hardly unblemished when it comes to all things LTNs?
    • A song thrush visited my back garden today. I watched as it smashed open a snail by whacking it against the patio.
    • I have no doubt that local people are genuinely involved (and personally can understand their not wanting to publicise their involvement). That said the proliferation of One groups across London and the degree of co-ordination suggests it is more than just a local grassroots group. I’m not really that interested, except that many of their supporters do bang on about transparency and accountability. I would be interested in the substance of their latest missive. Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Who genuinely believes that people are partially covering their plates and driving through due to inadequate signage? Sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. It feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes tbh.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...