Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Fox - as has been mentioned more than once - you are talking about the US recipe. The UK recipe is very different. Also, the people who pay a premium for organic, locally sourced yada yada generally don't eat in McDonald's. You've missed the mark...

According to the McDonalds UK website, ingredients for fries are as follows:


Potatoes, Vegetable Oil (Sunflower, Rapeseed), Dextrose (only added at beginning of the potato season).

Prepared in the restaurants using a non-hydrogenated vegetable oil.

Salt is added after cooking.


http://www.mcdonalds.co.uk/ukhome/product_nutrition.sides.44.mcdonalds-fries.html

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > My original post was just to highlight that

> 17-19 were used to produce French Fries..

>

> 18 is citric acid. Prime component of lemon

> juice. What's your issue with that?


Nothing at all. But I can make chips at home without using lemon Juice..


DulwichFox

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Nothing at all. But I can make chips at home

> without using lemon Juice..

>

> I've no doubt you can. But can you make 200 tonne

> of them?


FFS..


I'm going to have a nice soak in my tub... Boil my head.. then off out to meet my public..


Hopefully find someone to have a sensible conversation with.


Anyone with a mental age of 8 should do after spending time here.


DF

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm going to have a nice soak in my tub... Boil my head.. then off out to meet my public..

> Hopefully find someone to have a sensible conversation with.

> Anyone with a mental age of 8 should do after spending time here.


Hello, Foxy's off on a flounce.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know people in the country who take home

> anything they run over and cook it for their

> families because they don't want the animal to

> have died in vain. Ethics are tougher in the

> country apparently.


I have always thought of that as an argument of convenience somewhat.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I know people in the country who take home

> > anything they run over and cook it for their

> > families because they don't want the animal to

> > have died in vain. Ethics are tougher in the

> > country apparently.

>

> I have always thought of that as an argument of

> convenience somewhat.


Personally I thought it was revolting. One friend became such an enthusiast she would sit in her car idling the engine waiting for something to step out. The bloodlust became clear when her family refused to eat it and she carried on.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fox - as has been mentioned more than once - you

> are talking about the US recipe. The UK recipe is

> very different. Also, the people who pay a premium

> for organic, locally sourced yada yada generally

> don't eat in McDonald's. You've missed the mark...


Not to mention the fact, that, to my knowledge, none of the people on here are abject morons.


Fox, do you really think any of us thinks that McDonalds food is good for us? I like good food, but sometimes I eat a Snickers, and I know it's shit, but I am more than ok with that. Beer's bad for you. Smoking's bad for you. Too much cheese is bad for you. But we drink, smoke, eat fondue and go see the personal trainer. I am entirely at peace with the cognitive dissonance.


Oh. And it's not even the bloody UK recipe anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just for information: I see that the Licensing Sub-committee has the Tesco application as item 1 on their 24 July meeting agenda.  https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=172&MId=8329. The officer's report to the committtee provides a good succinct summary.  I see, from (original) p.31 of the full public pack, (or more conveniently the supporting documents) that Tesco Legal Dept on 12 June reported that they'd agreed with the police's suggested conditions to be attached to the licence, and the police accordingly withdrew their own representation.  That leaves just one representation, from a member of the public, to be dealt with on the day. I still think it's not necessarily to be presumed that Tesco will definitely be taking over the premises.  I see that Poundland themselves were granted an off-sales licence on 21 Feb 2023, and surrendered it on 3 July 2025.  I'm not sure they actually ever used it themselves.  Did they? https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Statement of Licensing Policy 2021-2026.pdf is a full statement of the policy and its application, for thems as is interested.
    • I'm now just following David Peckham around, posting laughing emojis on all his comments.   
    • Well, quite. Do you know where your lad's going tonight?
    • I'd get rid of duty free shopping.  Nothing to do with tourist tax but something I hate.  All that glitz as you try to get through to Wetherspoons in the departure lounge.  No great savings over on line or even at times supermarkets, and the hypocrisy of selling cheap cancer sticks. Ok back to tourist tax  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...