Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SteveUK1978 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Really interesting - thanks for posting.

>

> Turned out the modern, safe, light and airy

> housing blocks didn't stand the test of time

> compared the the dirty, dark victorian properties!



Not sure I agree, many of these blocks still stand and house lots of people. My parent's Victorian house in ED only got an indoor toilet about 1975.


Basically there's an element of snobbery in people being so desperate to live in a Victorian house.

Otta Wrote:


>

> Not sure I agree, many of these blocks still stand

> and house lots of people. My parent's Victorian

> house in ED only got an indoor toilet about 1975.

>

> Basically there's an element of snobbery in people

> being so desperate to live in a Victorian house.


The "new" blocks that still stand are roughly 50 years old. It is unlikely they will see another 50 years. The victorian houses are roughly 150 years old and will likely see another 150 years. Not much to agree or disagree on in terms of which ones have stood the test of time.

much of the ED 19c housing stock is a pretty poor example of the era - you may be fond of your 750K semi with side return , but the chances are it has virtually no foundation & some well flimsy internal stuff going on eg crap joist fitment & no tying in. the stock in the area was virtually no different in concept than any other large scale speculative design of later times.

Well said miga.



There were some horrid looking estates (Haygate I'm looking at you), but equally there was no need to knock it down, Southwark could have updated it for less money than they've had to spend on the shambolic arrangements with Lend Lease. But at the end of the day it was unsightly, and knocking it down gave them the perfect chance rid the borough of those unsightly residents.


Personally I hate the Barbican, but I know poeple that think it's wonderful. Different folks and all that. But in terms of interior, give me a large open spacious flat over a pokey victorian or 1930s house any day.


I used to think having a garden was important to me, but had one for 5 years until last Feb, rarely used it, and haven't missed it at all except for no birthday BBQ.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The refurbishing and redoing of Victorian terraces

> has been in fashion how long? Maybe 30 years (if

> you were a pioneer)?


Probably nearer 50+ years. The Camberwell Society has been around for 45 years and came into existence in response to the first group of people trying to renovate and save the houses on Camberwell Grove. They'd been doing this since the late 50s/ early 60s. I'd consider them pioneers.



> There is already a fashion groundswell of redoing

> ex-LA flats in era-appropriate ways, and "mid

> century modern" has been a popular phrase for a

> few years too.


Isn't this more to do with the amount of ex-LA flats which are now in private hands? They are also more affordable for younger first time buyers, so the groundswell is as much financial as fashion. Leaving aside the private ownership debate, this level of maintenance will help secure their future.


I agree about a matter of taste, but many "pokey" (Otta's word) Victorian house these days are opened up into bright modern spaces. As prices rise and we all try and get best use of space, this will increase too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @HeadNun I haven't been through the assessment for mental health issues, god knows they treat you like you have one when you are assessed for motability issues. Therefore I can't comment on what you've read but don't always believe what the media telks you as they often sensationalise things to sell papers and bend the story slightly 😉  All I am doing in this thread is asking people who disagree to the PIP reform in its current format to write to their MP to say so and ask for a well consulted and thought through change. I'm not here to change people's minds but happy to discuss how disability impacts lives.
    • I hate the idea of someone with a genuine disability losing money, it's heart-breaking. I thought the whole idea of these cuts was to get kids with mental health issues, which we used to call 'the human condition', off benefits and into a job. Before anyone says anything, I'm not talking about people with severe autism.  If the tests are so astringent, Spartacus, how come healthy youngsters with anxiety are getting benefits? It's ludicrous.  This from The Times:  Then there is mental health. This is the fastest-growing category of claim; anxiety and depression is now the single biggest reason to claim PIPs, accounting for 16 per cent of spending. Including problems such as autism and ADHD, there are 1.4 million people claiming for “psychiatric disorders”, almost 40 per cent of the total.   NHS figures on Thursday found that 23 per cent of people of working age now have a mental disorder, up from 18 per cent a decade ago, rising to 26 per cent in 16 to 24 year-olds. Young people are most likely to claim benefits for mental health problems and there is growing concern about a generation who may do so for decades. The number of children on disability living allowance, the precursor to PIPs, will reach a million by the end of the decade, double pre-Covid levels. Most of these are for behavioural problems such as ADHD or learning disabilities  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...