Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's best not to have a tree by the petrol

> station - with bus queues and pedestrian traffic,

> it is not very practical. I agree, however, that

> it needs to be filled in.



I agree, this one by Texaco on Grove Vale is placed in the most stupid place.

Are we of the opinion that this replanting isn't being done anyway? I reported a dangerous stump in Rodwell Road last year, and it was removed. The tree pit now has a young (fenced off) tree in it, after a few months of being empty.


Just wondering if this cataloging is going to achieve something that's already in-hand?

I'm also liaising with the Tree Dept and both ED and Village ward cllrs on updating the empty tree pit spreadsheet as there hasn't been a proper survey for a while now. I was going to start a thread like this, but I keep getting caught out by the CloudFlare problems. So this thread is very useful.


FYI, according to the last spreadsheet I updated, both 1 Glengarry and 86 (and also 45) Beauval are on the list to be replaced before the end of April. 1 Glengarry is to be a Prunus x Yedoensis (Japanese specimen cherry) the Beauval trees are to be Ginkgos to match the existing avenue.


But everything is on hold until the new treeplanting guide is approved... if the new specs for 1m x 1m pits are imposed, this could severely limit future replanting in Dulwich... in which case we might have to launch a new protest.

Thanks rch. Would this thread not be useful to persuade the powers that be that we would like the pits filled in before the 1m x 1m rule is imposed. THe empty pits look forlorn: at least have the manners to fill them in with concrete or a paving flag, council!

Hi Nigello, yes that was the plan, but obstacles are now hitting, so I'm waiting to hear if the issue can be resolved internally before we go into a public protest. Bear in mind that this ruling could seriously affect the character of the whole area if we can't plant trees as most of our pavements aren't wide enough to accommodate 1m x 1m pits.


In the meantime, it's probably best to leave the empty treepits unfilled in the short term as it will only cost more money to re-clear them for planting - only the pits which are definitely not going to be replanted are being repaved. We are lobbying for any pits that can't be replanted to be awarded another tree in the area in lieu (we have a separate Lieu List), but digging new pits costs extra money, which in turn eats into the replanting budget.


This is why both Ed and Village ward cllrs have awarded CGS funds for tree planting, in order to supplement internal budget.


We should hear back on the 1m x 1m policy in a week or two, then hopefully the planting list that was agreed in the autumn will go through in March and then we can start the surveys up again over the summer to prepare for next years planting list. Fyi, planting season runs from Sept-March when the trees are dormant.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...