Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Claire29 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I dont think it's fair just to assume all people

> on this forum are the same or use the term "half

> caste", I dont know anyone who uses that term

> anymore.




It's not the fact that he/she used that term that bothers me so much as the fact that nobody thought to point out that it is offensive. That says a lot.

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think what you need to remember is that there

> are some posters who may be unaware that mixed

> race is the way to describe somebody of that

> persuasion, I don't think that because of that

> oversight you can say the site is racist.



Thanks Mike. I shall continue to observe in a detached and emotionless manner.

OHMYGOD! Mikecg... I agree completely. I am getting one of my heads, I shall need to go and lie down!


Halal_face sweetie,


If you want to engage in debate or lively bantor you are more than welcome on this forum. If your agenda is to insite confrontation, that is my job, go away and cause trouble elsewhere. We are not racists.

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OHMYGOD! Mikecg... I agree completely. I am

> getting one of my heads, I shall need to go and

> lie down!

>

> Halal_face sweetie,

>

> If you want to engage in debate or lively bantor

> you are more than welcome on this forum. If your

> agenda is to insite confrontation, that is my job,

> go away and cause trouble elsewhere. We are not

> racists.



(?)

microbite Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Steve T

>

> You've done it now lol! we are now going to get

> inundated with people and their comments regarding

> their pet pooche's rights of way, rights to run

> free unfettered in the park blah blah blah, and at

> the risk of biting small children who really

> should be supervised anyways by their parents!


I really must protest! My pet poochies should have right of way, and should be able to run unfettered in the park.


I also feel that small children should be adequately supervised by their parents.


TLS (on behalf of The Westie Pack: Alice 6, Phoebe 6, Max 7, Sammy, 11.)

YOU ALL NEED TO GET A FC*KING LIFE FOR GODS SAKE.....if you tossers could read your posts about dogs, you'd see what I mean. The dogs that I love, the Westies, Parsons, Cairns and the like are wasted on you blithing driveling fools. Who fcuking well cares if an Alsatian knawed you as a young boy, be grateful and get over it. Dogs act as a result of how their owners treat them. Rocket science it aint.
When I was a kid we had a Jack Russel the thing was mad, when I let it off the lead it would seek out the biggest dog in the park and launch itself at it, usually around the throat. Dobermans and Rottweilers were his favorites, in the end I couldn't let him off the lead because I knew if he got it wrong it would have been game over. He loved people and kids though, a great pet for a boy of 11.

"

YOU ALL NEED TO GET A FC*KING LIFE FOR GODS SAKE.....if you tossers could read your posts about dogs, you'd see what I mean. The dogs that I love, the Westies, Parsons, Cairns and the like are wasted on you blithing driveling fools. Who fcuking well cares if an Alsatian knawed you as a young boy, be grateful and get over it. Dogs act as a result of how their owners treat them. Rocket science it aint."



I'm PRETTY sure that constitutes grounds for reporting, containing as it does at least several of the following


"false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, threatening"


But don't think my dislike is reserved for dogs. As you rightly point out dogs behave depending on how their owners treat them. So my bile is also aimed at said owners. I'm especially wary of owners who think "who cares" if a dog attacks and that I should be grateful? Grateful for what exactly? That my injuries could have been worse?


On a final note, behavioral psychology is a lot harder than rocket science.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...