Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Claire29 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I dont think it's fair just to assume all people

> on this forum are the same or use the term "half

> caste", I dont know anyone who uses that term

> anymore.




It's not the fact that he/she used that term that bothers me so much as the fact that nobody thought to point out that it is offensive. That says a lot.

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think what you need to remember is that there

> are some posters who may be unaware that mixed

> race is the way to describe somebody of that

> persuasion, I don't think that because of that

> oversight you can say the site is racist.



Thanks Mike. I shall continue to observe in a detached and emotionless manner.

OHMYGOD! Mikecg... I agree completely. I am getting one of my heads, I shall need to go and lie down!


Halal_face sweetie,


If you want to engage in debate or lively bantor you are more than welcome on this forum. If your agenda is to insite confrontation, that is my job, go away and cause trouble elsewhere. We are not racists.

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OHMYGOD! Mikecg... I agree completely. I am

> getting one of my heads, I shall need to go and

> lie down!

>

> Halal_face sweetie,

>

> If you want to engage in debate or lively bantor

> you are more than welcome on this forum. If your

> agenda is to insite confrontation, that is my job,

> go away and cause trouble elsewhere. We are not

> racists.



(?)

microbite Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Steve T

>

> You've done it now lol! we are now going to get

> inundated with people and their comments regarding

> their pet pooche's rights of way, rights to run

> free unfettered in the park blah blah blah, and at

> the risk of biting small children who really

> should be supervised anyways by their parents!


I really must protest! My pet poochies should have right of way, and should be able to run unfettered in the park.


I also feel that small children should be adequately supervised by their parents.


TLS (on behalf of The Westie Pack: Alice 6, Phoebe 6, Max 7, Sammy, 11.)

YOU ALL NEED TO GET A FC*KING LIFE FOR GODS SAKE.....if you tossers could read your posts about dogs, you'd see what I mean. The dogs that I love, the Westies, Parsons, Cairns and the like are wasted on you blithing driveling fools. Who fcuking well cares if an Alsatian knawed you as a young boy, be grateful and get over it. Dogs act as a result of how their owners treat them. Rocket science it aint.
When I was a kid we had a Jack Russel the thing was mad, when I let it off the lead it would seek out the biggest dog in the park and launch itself at it, usually around the throat. Dobermans and Rottweilers were his favorites, in the end I couldn't let him off the lead because I knew if he got it wrong it would have been game over. He loved people and kids though, a great pet for a boy of 11.

"

YOU ALL NEED TO GET A FC*KING LIFE FOR GODS SAKE.....if you tossers could read your posts about dogs, you'd see what I mean. The dogs that I love, the Westies, Parsons, Cairns and the like are wasted on you blithing driveling fools. Who fcuking well cares if an Alsatian knawed you as a young boy, be grateful and get over it. Dogs act as a result of how their owners treat them. Rocket science it aint."



I'm PRETTY sure that constitutes grounds for reporting, containing as it does at least several of the following


"false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, threatening"


But don't think my dislike is reserved for dogs. As you rightly point out dogs behave depending on how their owners treat them. So my bile is also aimed at said owners. I'm especially wary of owners who think "who cares" if a dog attacks and that I should be grateful? Grateful for what exactly? That my injuries could have been worse?


On a final note, behavioral psychology is a lot harder than rocket science.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...