Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Unless someone knows him personally and is privy to such sensitive information, how would anyone on here know they were ''adding fuel to the fire'' AM? As Otta rightly pointed out earlier, Medic could be a WUM when he wanted, yet took offence easily...

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> reading many of RPC posts maybe I'm inured to her

> tone.




I've had to stop myself (twice this week) from calling her out for being a rude bitch.


Complete and utter lack of empathy, and judgemental in a really bad way.

Like AM, RPC is a smart cookie. And I suspect her outright rudeness of late is also down to offline matters (she has always been prone to directness. Which isn't always a bad thing. But recently she has gone too far)


She might disagree. Which means everything is a ok in real life and she is just being hostile and rude for no good reason

Just to clarify, I've no real problem with RPC (my previous post sounds a bit strong now I read it back), but on occasion (like the fathers thing, and the response to the woman who#s daughter dropped her phone down the bog) I've been gobsmacked by her posts.

It's been said before but unless one brackets with txtese, or ejaculates emoticons over the screen, misunderstandings of posts are bound to occur as happened in the 'bob' exchange*.


It can be a pain having to spell things out afterwards to avoid a snarl-fest and a grudging acceptance of the explanation by the 'aggrieved' (implying they're not 100% convinced) might leave one thinking 'why do I fecking bother?'


This may lead to an epiphany of the "it's all bollocks" kind; with the forumite carrying on regardless, serene in the knowledge that it IS all bollocks and so doesn't matter.


Alternatively the revelation is that it is all bollocks and so totally pointless which ends in a retreat or sabbatical or flounce or attempt to quit cold-turkey.


So I suppose it depends which side of the bed you get up.


*Not the *Bob* exchange (to avoid misunderstandi- ....)

what... critique of RPC is ganging up by old posters? I dunno - she's an old hand at this. Nor is she a shy wilting flower...


Anyone.. anyone, old or new, is capable of being out of order. Anyone can be called on it - far too easy to say "old posters" rather than look at the charge

Quids is just above all this nonsense.


But for the record, if several people independently think that someone is being rude, then perhaps it might be worth considering whether maybe just maybe that person is actually being rude. Rather than just firing off the very easy "clique" card.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I rather like RPC. We don't agree on a few things,

> but that's life on the forums. She usually a good

> read.



Yes she is. But that's not to say that SOMETIMES she could think about how her posts might come across to another poster.


And if I've offended I'm sure she'll tell me and I'll apologise.

cannot believe a lot of you never realised that alanmedic was an anagram!!! actually quite gobsmacked by that.


lady (or was it laddie?) muck if I recall pointed that one out aaaaaaaages and aaaaaaaaaages ago. I truly thought it was common knowledge amongst regular posters on here


met the good Dr Medic IRL and he is indeed a lovely person, I do hope he graces the forum with his presence again soon. I do think a lot of people have taken his posts in the wrong way and I myself have been guilty of that in the past too until I got his posting style. I remember the lovely PGC (also miss their posts) tried to intervene in his favour once when everyone got the wrong end of the stick about something. anyway hurry back Dr...there are 100s to be got! Don't give quids the bloody satisfaction :))

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> StraferJack Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > reading many of RPC posts maybe I'm inured to

> her

> > tone.

>

>

>

> I've had to stop myself (twice this week) from

> calling her out for being a rude bitch.

>

> Complete and utter lack of empathy, and

> judgemental in a really bad way.



For what it's worth, this post wasn't meant to be public, I'd meant to send SJ a PM and didn't realise my mistake until it had been commented on.


Now this could be looked at as worse (PMing one poster about another), I get that. But I wanted to clarify that I hadn't intended to start a public put down of anybody.


That is the honest truth.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...