Jump to content

Photo sharing.


Salsaboy

Recommended Posts

flickr is mostly free now, no limits on photos, just some advanced functionailty on pro accounts

very good photo sharing site.


Google+ allows for sharng photo albums and integrates with picasa, which is quite a neat photo organisation tool, including automted face tagging, albums etc


If it's just transferring image then any number of dropboxy type apps out there, google drive, picturelife etc, but dropbox is a good start ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make sure you tick the Copyright licence on your Flickr photos if you use that, as otherwise they are free to monetise any of your shots without asking you - so you could have family photos used in an online advertising campaign for example. This is really sad as it also prevents people such as students who have benefited from the creative commons licences used on many photos on Flickr when stuck for an image for example.


500 pix is also pretty good, but you'd soon end up paying, whereas with Flickr you do get a juicy free terrabyte of storage.


You can also post your Instagram url to share photos via the web.


Happy snapping (wish my LX3 hadn't died) !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It feels like a group who don't believe that private motoring should be discouraged and have no answers to the air quality problem, whereas the original Cleanairdulwich are campaigning to reduce pollution. Sadly we live in a world where if you are rich, you will generally live in nicer houses, have nicer environments and cleaner air.  That is capitalism for you, but I doubt whether there would be greater health equally in the former Soviet Union either.  Dulwich village was once full of industrialists and the like who didn't want to live in polluted central London where most would have made their money.  I will contact Cleanairdulwich and hopefully provide a better perspective.  Whether it is one individual or a whole community I support what they are doing.  
    • ??? When they refer to "all Dulwich", I took that to mean including the residents of the streets where the traffic has been directed into due to the LTNs, which are presumably experiencing greater pollution/stress,  whereas the "privileged few" in the LTN areas are experiencing lower pollution due to less traffic. Hence the reference to inequality. Sorry if I've got the terminology wrong.
    • That's interesting, because I thought the Overground would transform Forest Hill, but I don't see much evidence of that. Have I missed it? Can't say I've noticed much change in Penge either though, on the rare occasions I go there 😂 , so maybe I'm just inattentive ....
    • I've not heard of many moving to SE23 from SE22 or choosing SE23 over SE22 in the first place.  Certainly Clapham and other expensive places to the west.  It may be that this is my demographic but there was always a feeling that Forest Hill was rougher, off the beaten track, until the arrival of the Overground changed everything.  But there again the gentrification of Penge is astonishing
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...