Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ellem86 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unless I've missed something, OP didn't say the

> bad tenants were DSS


I was assuming from experience - E. Dulwich is expensive to rent and the people who can afford it might have slightly loud alcholic tea-parties, but otherwise nothing describing OPs problems. But I'm derailing the convo.... carry on

Unfortunately I don't think there is much you can do. You can report them to the police, but unless their music is loud and aggressive late into the night, and you have some definite proof they are taking drugs even the police can't do much. They can't enter a premises on the basis of drugs without a warrant.


Have you tried approaching their landlord directly?

Tetris... what an insulting stereotypical response..if there "bad drug taking neighbours" then they have to be dss tenants.!! .couldn't possibly be anything else.

It's that sort of attitude that makes it hard for people who,for whatever reasons,have to try and find a decent place to live whilst on benefits.

My gran had a lot of very nice helpful young people living next door to her and she was a plant lover. They went on holiday and asked her to look after their pot plants which she put on her balcony..and they literally were 'pot' plants and she didn't know (until I visited her and she's saying 'oh look at these lovely plants, aren't the leaves attractive' and so on.....)

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My gran had a lot of very nice helpful young

> people living next door to her and she was a plant

> lover. They went on holiday and asked her to look

> after their pot plants which she put on her

> balcony..and they literally were 'pot' plants and

> she didn't know (until I visited her and she's

> saying 'oh look at these lovely plants, aren't the

> leaves attractive' and so on.....)


Then you had a little smoke together, right?


That would be a perfect story ending




On the original OP. I had something similar, so contacted the landlord direct. It worked out ok in the end

  • 1 month later...

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This thread is a no brainer.

>

> If they are doing illegal things report them to

> the police

> If they are making excessive noise report to

> Environmental Health

> If they aren't doing either, speak to your local

> coucillor about what can or can't be done.


Thanks for the best laugh of the day with that one! No brainer indeed.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This thread is a no brainer.

>

> If they are doing illegal things report them to

> the police

> If they are making excessive noise report to

> Environmental Health

> If they aren't doing either, speak to your local

> coucillor about what can or can't be done.


Yes, no brainer, agreed to all the above. But before going to the local councillor, you need to speak to the landlord, as the tenancy may have info about what is/isn't acceptable.


Also agreed with others, re drug-taking alone is not necessarily anti-social behaviour. However, if there are minors living in the property, and you strongly suspect that they are being put in jeopardy, then you should report it to social services or the police.


In your complaints/enquiries for further info, you need to be able to document specific behaviours that have led to anti-social outcomes on multiple occasion over a period of time.


From your post, it's not clear what you mean by "anti-social", so if it's just noise, I tend to agree with Otta that you should just talk to them. If they've been aggressive towards you, then you need to document it. A witness would help.


Good luck. xx

Jules6862 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tetris... what an insulting stereotypical

> response..if there "bad drug taking neighbours"

> then they have to be dss tenants.!! .couldn't

> possibly be anything else.

> It's that sort of attitude that makes it hard for

> people who,for whatever reasons,have to try and

> find a decent place to live whilst on benefits.


Whilst Alcohol is acceptable (even encouraged) employers

and vetters hate any form of illegal drug. (I understand

why a lot of people think that's unfair)


it is just a huge no no with them if they even suspect.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So you are justifying building on the green belt, in Londons case "the lungs of London" which will causes harm to natures ability to turn co2 into o2? 
    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...