Jump to content

Proposed construction of a 25m mobile phone mast at the junction of Village Way and Half Moon Lane


Recommended Posts

"I find it very offensive....etc., etc."


Widely held concerns are not necessarily valid. In fact they are often stupid and ill-informed, and widely held simply because they chime with widely held prejudices, superstitions and the like. That offends me (intellectually) but I am evidently made of sterner stuff, because I manage to shrug it off. I'm afraid you will need to develop a rather thicker skin if you are going to invite people to join a campaign based on such a shaky premise - you can expect some challenge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the map above it seems that there are no masts within the Dulwich estate boundary? Dave R I suggest you lobby the Dulwich estate for a 25 meter mast and 6 large cabinets in a central village location? This would seem to be in a better location for all concerned? But perhaps this does not in the view of Dulwich estate supports the 'preservation of the character of the area - the appearance of individual properties is in harmony with that of neighbouring buildings, maintaining the integrity of streetscapes and there is an almost rural feel due to an abundance of trees and open spaces.'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elephant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Looking at the map above it seems that there are

> no masts within the Dulwich estate boundary?


That's right.


The Dulwich Estates management are Luddites. They don't understand that efficient communications are vital in today's world. They have objected to other masts and so the phone reception in the Village is dismal.


Similarly, they want to use bicycles for every journey - hence their support for potty modifications to the Townley Road junction.


I live in the village and to think that we pay them a levy every year for the privilege, really goes against the grain.


Villager

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't there a mobile mast on the Pelo ground, within the Estate? Doesn't seem to be on the diagram, but just googled it and it seems there is a separate planning application to upgrade it?


planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9558973

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this mast gets built, will it benefit users of all of the mobile networks (O2, EE etc) or only a limited number of them?


Also, does anyone know what the likely range will be that it benefits? The map that Villager posted shows a black hole and it would be helpful to know whether this new mast (if built) will fill that hole or only part of it? It may be that it will, but the further away the user is the less the potential benefit in improved signal?


It will clearly be an eyesore, but in weighing that up against the potential benefit, it would be helpful to understand what the potential benefit actually is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MiniViking Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If this mast gets built, will it benefit users of

> all of the mobile networks (O2, EE etc) or only a

> limited number of them?

>

The supporting docos say that it is for Vodafone and O2 for 3G and 4G services.


It's part o Vodafone's "Project Spring" ?13Bn investment programme and they will sub-let to O2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sanity girl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It will only benefit people who have mobile phones

> that use 4G. I have an iPhone 4s that uses 3G not

> 4G. So no, I don't think it will benefit all

> mobile users.


Should you read the supporting documents you may find that it covers 2G,3G and 4G specifically..

4G 800 MHz

Cellular Band

2G/3G 900 MHz

Cellular Band

2G 1800 MHz

Cellular Band

3G 2100 MHz

Cellular Band

4G 2600 MHz

Cellular Band

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

According to the Dulwich Society Newsletter.

________

Proposed Mobile Phone mast on the corner of Village Way & Half Moon Lane: Along with more than 270 other local residents, the Society objected to the planning application to install a radio base station at this junction. The Council has now refused the application.

___________


I wonder on what mandate the Dulwich Society objected? Did it raise the opinion of its members - I don't recall responding.


Good news it is rejected though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So you are a ‘member’ 😳whatever that means, but also not. It’s not very clear…. But also totally transparent. Miaow 💅😂 Maybe I will, maybe I won’t 😂 What is interesting about your questions is that they suggest, as usual, that you see everything as a really basic binary opposition (cars vs bike, anti LTN vs pro-council etc). It’s not very nuanced Rocks. I don’t have great love for Southwark council as I suspect you assume. That said, neither do I have a lot of time for the apocalyptic hyperbole of those still upset over a fairly minor change to a road junction in the village, made several years ago, and which actually creates a nice public space for pedestrians and a bit more safety for kids travelling to school by bike. Ah, what the hell, let’s play…as you asked so nicely: The one that took place between May and July 2021 I don’t know much about this. It seems they did reopen it though, presumably at their request? Apparently they have the agreement of the emergency services this time, (which perhaps does suggests they didn’t consult with them properly the first time round). Of course someone (the mysterious Mr One?) believes the emergency services are being intimidated somehow (possibly by commies) so maybe Southwark still haven’t learnt their lesson? No, I don’t. Although I hear the Mysterious Mr One would like it redesigned to make things clearer. 😂 As for your ‘question 3 sub-points’ I don’t actually agree with their premise (a bit of the old ‘how often do you beat your wife’ framing going on there… slippery 😂) Anyway good luck with the referendum.   
    • I often walk past 'Kenro Press' and think it looks very sad and negleted. I wonder when it was last a viable business - tried googling it but nothing much came up Great to hear it is being brought back to life, perhaps a pity it will not be a new usefull retail premises. Lots of work needed so good luck with your renovation
    • No I don't disagree. I wasn't condoning drivers getting confused and the debate on whether refresher tests should be taken is a long one and is something probably for a Malumbu- thread!   I take it you never entered your details as someone agreeing with their sentiment but lots of Dulwich residents did and as part of that you get their email updates. So no, I have nothing to do with tje group beyond one of those two thousand dots on their website as a "member" is me!   Now, are you going to answer my questions or pretend you never saw them....p.s. we have seen this tactic before - happy to throw questions but not happy to answer some yourself...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...