Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Most places welcome children especially for Sunday lunch as this is traditionally a time where families meet for a dimsum meal. I quite like:

Young cheng http://www.timeout.com/london/restaurants/young-cheng

Imperial china http://www.timeout.com/london/restaurants/imperial-china


Bear in mind places get busy so make sure you make a booking and service may be a bit rushed/frantic.

I've always enjoyed New World for Sunday dim sum.Gets busy but you can queue up get a ticket and I've never had to wait longer than ten minutes.They have the old stainless steel carts they wheel to your table so once you are sat down you can get food within a few minutes.Haven't been post children (due to our daughter's sesame allergy!) but always used to see families eating together so definitely family friendly.

I second the New World. I've been there with my children, and it works well there, dining with children, as they can see what is coming around on the trolleys and choose what they would like to eat. It's a bit like a mobile buffet so there is next to no time between sitting down and the first mouthful! It is not a quiet place, many families and people talking.

Renata

There isn't anywhere in Chinatown I can think of where kids are not welcome, and as already mentioned on a Sunday lunchtime you can expect to see loads of families with three or even four generations sat together.


New World is a good choice, I think the best quality dim sum is at Joy King Lau which is just off Lisle Street, Dumplings Legend on Gerrard Street unsurprisingly does really good dumplings (and you can see them being made), or if you fancy roast duck go to Four Seasons.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • 🤣 Yes, I can't imagine they'd thank you for that. Sounds like keeping the car is probably the right thing for you.
    • That ULEZ check is not necessarily accurate, as someone pointed out above. I did it ages ago. I don't cycle. I got a bike, had a space in a bike shelter (in fact requested one on our road), had a disastrous lesson from someone who appeared to think I was about nine years old, fell off and gave up. A refugee now has my bike and someone else has my space in the shelter thing. Our tent is too big to easily take on public transport, let alone all the other stuff. If you travel light, good for you, but my backpacking days are long gone, as are my days of happily sleeping in a tent I can't stand up in! I didn't know about this zip car point to point option. Is that to anywhere in the UK? Thanks but I did all the sums when I decided to keep the car, and the convenience for me outweighed the obviously considerable annual  cost. I don't think an Uber driver would be very happy to convey things like bags of smelly compost to my allotment 🤣 Which I can take on the bus but it's somewhat embarrassing 🤣
    • If you think about the amount you spend on keeping and using a car and how infrequently you use it, you might be better just getting the occasional Uber. We often underestimate the cost of owning a car, as opposed to using a cab. There is actually a name for it in Psychology ('the taxi meter effect'). It's likely you're spending at least £1000 - £1,500 a year on keeping a car (£500 on insurance, £200 on MOT and service / repairs, £180 on VED, Then the ULEZ fee each time you use it, plus fuel, plus depreciation... maybe minimal in this case). If you put that in a separate 'pot' and used it to cover the occasional Uber, you may find your needs more than covered. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...