Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We have 3 children, two are girls and one, the youngest, is a boy. We could only afford to send one to public fee paying school. Who should go. I'm having this debate with my wife at the moment. I think the boy, as he will, on balance of probabilities be in a career the longest. Anyone agree or disagree?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5566-public-school-who-goes/
Share on other sites

In her excellent analysis on that other thread RosieH posted this:

"Some women choose a career over children. Some women choose children over a career. Some women choose to have both. And it's our right to choose"....so assuming she is right (it makes sense to me) then you and your Young Lady will have to decide the percentage call on which way she will choose.

As far as I know, the Boy will have little "comparitve" choice, the keyword imo being "comparitive"...its extremely rare for a Boy to choose anything other than a Career.

This may influence your decision.

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As far as I know, the Boy will have little

> "comparitve" choice, the keyword imo being

> "comparitive"...its extremely rare for a Boy to

> choose anything other than a Career.

> This may influence your decision.


They might choose to have a life of their own choosing, as opposed to having the weight of expectation fall upon their shoulders on account of receiving entirely special - not to mention expensive - treatment to that of their siblings.

In general an education at a Public School will give you a much better chance of academic qualifications.


This,in turn,can only assist the opportunities and passage into a career.


Its "perceived" by most Employers that an individual will have greatly benefitted from a Public School education, thus they will, "in general", view more favourably an application from a former Public School pupil, if all other things are, roughly, equal.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Have to agree with ruffers... no really I do...

>

> I had to work with a group of cambridge students

> the other night... no brains there at all... it's

> all a waste I tell ya!


Yeah! but you're one of those smarty pants inter-lec-tools though ain't yer Kel so most would intellectually pale into significance alongside you;-)


p.s. Wot U doing 'bout my bleedin' drains Babe?:X:))

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tony my dear I didnt have the choice of private

> schooling and I did pretty well for myself - got

> though GCSEs with fairly respectable marks, I went

> on to sixth form and then University. Now I have

> other qualifications that cancel out school grades

> on a CV :p


Of course my beloved...I came from one of the roughest estates in Europe and made it to Grammar School onwards (or should that be "downwards":) but there's no doubt that most will benefit from a superior Headucation than we received.

Don't mean we can't make it but its harder yougetme, innit? !

Mick, this reminds of a old movie with Meryl Streep I think! Which one do I leave behind? I came from a large family and I was the 6th boy. By the time my education was an issue my folks had spent all their money on the other ones. Four went to boarding school; results were as follows


One became the most qualified engineer specialising in pollution in the country and decided on to teach instead of making a fortune


Two eventually went bankrupt


Three became a hippy


Four, sadly died while still at school


There is no answer to your question. See how you 'feel' and leave logic at the door!

it's true this seems like a set up.

especially that rubbish about the boy being in a career the longest.


although there was an article in the family section of the saturday guardian about this very thing a few weeks ago.


If you have that money 'spare' why not spend it on a fab holiday every year for the whole family? or let them each choose an expensive and time consuming hobby and spend it on that?


Or save it so they can all go on to university (if they want) and not have to work in a call centre/bar/strip club to pay their rent while they do it?

If you're prepared to make two of your children feel like second class citizens then go for it. My two brothers and I went to public school. My sister, then aged 10, chose not to. 30 years later she's still deeply resentful and makes sure my parents know about it.


As mightyroar says, your money would be better put to use doing good stuff together as a family (some of it could even be educational if you were so inclined).


But if you do decide to choose one, go for the boy - he'll need the extra help as girls outperform boys in education.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...