Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know. Depleting the council housing stock and selling public assets for less than they're worth... yeah that's exactly what we need right now, isn't it?


Also talking about tax cuts (both inheritance tax and higher rate income tax) just doesn't seem right at a time when services are being slashed and the NHS is in crisis (and no I don't have any faith in his ?8bn pledge). Have heard Miliband being called "unelectable" over the last few months, but IMO he sounds much more fiscally responsible... what the tories are proposing just doesn't add up.

Oh well, cheer yourself up by reading the Green's manifesto. There's a set of policies dreamt up by a group of people in full knowledge that they will be nowhere near any form of power come May. It almost makes the Labour "free owls" policy look relatively sane and practical.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh well, cheer yourself up by reading the Green's

> manifesto. There's a set of policies dreamt up by

> a group of people in full knowledge that they will

> be nowhere near any form of power come May. It

> almost makes the Labour "free owls" policy look

> relatively sane and practical.


I think the Tory policies are drawn up assuming a hung

parliament - so they won't implement them in any coalition.


At least EdM tried.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the Tory policies are drawn up assuming a

> hung

> parliament - so they won't implement them in any

> coalition.


That's an interesting thought. I've been wondering how on earth the Tories think they'll be able to implement this ridiculous policy. The assets they're proposing to sell off belong to numerous private social enterprises. They would require a change in the law which would be unlikely to get through the Lords and would no doubt be open to legal challenge regardless. But perhaps they have no intention on this policy making it though coalition 'negotiations'.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think the Tory policies are drawn up assuming

> a

> > hung

> > parliament - so they won't implement them in

> any

> > coalition.

>

> That's an interesting thought. I've been wondering

> how on earth the Tories think they'll be able to

> implement this ridiculous policy. The assets

> they're proposing to sell off belong to numerous

> private social enterprises. They would require a

> change in the law which would be unlikely to get

> through the Lords and would no doubt be open to

> legal challenge regardless. But perhaps they have

> no intention on this policy making it though

> coalition 'negotiations'.



EXACTLY, they're not yours to sell you stupid bastard!

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cameron's pledge to extend 'Right to Buy' to

> Housing Association tenants is probably the most

> depressing thing I've heard during this entire

> campaign.



And in order to fund it they would force councils to sell off property as it became vacant, rather than reallocate to someone else.


It's twisted.

It's a completely bonkers policy. HAs will almost certainly legally challenge anyway. HAs have completely different financial setups to LAs when it come to home building. Only an idiot would think that homes sold off would be replaced at the same rate. This to me is the same Tory disbelief in social housing that got us partly into the mess we are in in the first place. They really do believe that anyone who works can afford a home or private rent! Would be a complete disaster if this went through. And I really can not believe they would force councils to sell of homes to pay for it! Who will replace the homes lost there?


Agree with some of the comments above re: Miliband and Labour looking like the responsible party now. The Conservatives have just gone a bit bonkers over the last few days. They have shown just how uninterested they really are in the real problems. And the Greens?....sigh.....

why hasnt anyone suggested extending help to buy scheme so that those council and housing association renters who wish to own their own property would be given the present/proposed discount off a property in the private sector. This would create a constant stream of vacant council/ association properties.

Many social housing tenants who work are on minimum/low wages Alice. That's why they are in social housing (and why we need it). They are never going to earn enough or be in stable enough employment to keep a mortgage on a private market property going.


And how about we stop artificially inflating the housing market and let it return to normal market forces. I.e. when first time buyers can no long afford to buy, the price comes down, instead of bringing out yet more products designed to give people part ownership etc.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Many social housing tenants who work are on

> minimum/low wages Alice. That's why they are in

> social housing (and why we need it). They are

> never going to earn enough or be in stable enough

> employment to keep a mortgage on a private market

> property going.

>

> And how about we stop artificially inflating the

> housing market and let it return to normal market

> forces. I.e. when first time buyers can no long

> afford to buy, the price comes down, instead of

> bringing out yet more products designed to give

> people part ownership etc.


I'd say that Shared Ownership isn't social housing

any more - it's a mechanism to buy when you can't

afford it.


Apparently you need 65K+ income min for the shared ownership

blocks in Elephant & Castle lend lease.

That's how I see it too John. It's an admission that prices are too high for ordinary working people to afford. Lend lease are just profiteers, who pretend to be specialists in urban regeneration.


Totally agree miga. There is no consideration of a problem that will take more than the lifetime of a parliament to rein in. It smacks of desperation really. Wishy washy Cameron couldn't win the last election outright and looks like he won't improve in this one. The delusion of power by the back door!


You have to ask yourself, do they really think these policies are the kinds of vote winner to swing an election? For the 1.3 million HAs tenants there are many more trapped in private rented accomodation or living with parents. I'd say the conservatives have now alienated those people.


When Thatcher came to power, the economy was so crippled it wasn't hard to be radical. If we want to be radical today, it has to be about bringing a fairer distribution of wealth surely? I don't see any of that from the Conservatives, just the usual pre-election tax bribes and giveaways, from a party that says we need to make more cuts in the next term to keep the deficit down! It just doesn't add up.

I completely agree that New Labour didn't do enough, BUT they did reduce the discount on right to buy. The coalition on the other hand increased it to a higher discount than even under Thatcher. The issue remains the same for both parties. We need more jobs and more people working as a percentage of the population to raise the taxes needed to look after everything else. Neither party seems to have any solutions for that. The Conservatives are total free market enthusiasts, but we know that the free market doesn't take care of everything (without regulation to force it to do so). Labour on the other hand stand for some regulation but are essentially free market supporters too. Neither party wants to alienate the only wealth creating sectors we have left, and rightly so but there needs to be more effort to support start ups and to help successful small businesses to expand (especially in new technologies).


On social housing. The free market has never taken care of people at the lower end of the pay scale. That's why social housing came about, along with the welfare state. Either we believe in a minimum quality of life, housing etc for all, or we don't. I think the demonisation of the poorest has only been possible because middle income earners are feeling the squeeze as much as the low waged. The cost of housing/ property is playing a huge role in that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've used just about all the locally available supermarkets for deliveries over the years, and I now  use Waitrose for deliveries, for various reasons. They have a good range of the things I eat, their food is good quality and their "essentials" range is generally good value (except the tissues, which suddenly became so thin as to disintegrate immediately. I was mainly buying them for the nice plain boxes, so now I just put other tissues into the old Waitrose boxes 🤣) It is very rare for something I've ordered to not be available on the day. Their delivery drivers  are genuinely friendly and helpful. Their customer service is very good. On the rare occasions I've had issues, they have refunded me without quibbling. They often have special deals on some of the things I buy often, so I stock up when they are cheaper. I do occasionally compare prices with other supermarkets, and overall I really don't think Waitrose is more expensive, but obviously they might be for things I don't personally buy. I absolutely hate Sainsbury's, would use Lidl for some things but they don't deliver, Iceland has a very small range of things I eat, and I can't remember why I don't use Tesco or Asda any more. I recently checked out Ocado because there was some offer which seemed good value, but they just didn't have enough things I wanted to buy to make it worth using the offer. M&S don't deliver ( to the best of my knowledge) but in any case they seem to be still badly suffering from the recent hack into their system. Apologies, I have just remembered this thread is about shopping at actual physical stores, but probably many of the issues are the same.
    • Since I am of a certain vintage now, not sure if what I am going to suggest is even still around but here goes… use to be able to buy “dummy/mock papers on line and also had mini synopsis of Shakespeare plays specifically covering students wanting to gain a better understanding of play before taking mocks/ exams. Only know this as many many moons ago, struggled with English Literature and Language and this was the avenue-my parents went down. Also was at this point in my life, educated abroad as part of my fathers job.  
    • Love your comment about “shoehorned” - put a smile on my face..! As for comment about “Little Waitrose” ummmm - never really thought about it. Personally, could not care less. But guess Sainsbury Local and Tesco Express are to you more acceptable.. Ultimately, when I think about it, I actually don’t care what they call themselves - been lured by partially branding and partially convenience and what they offer in groceries.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...