Jump to content

General Election 2015


MrBen

Recommended Posts

Excited about the General Election?


No? Never has politics been this depressing. The Lib Dems are arguably in a worse state after playing second fiddle in the coalition. The tories are now so middle they've lost voters in droves to UKIP. And Labour are lost and don't have a leader with charisma and backbone to make any gains. Worse, they'll be obliterated in Scotland this time round.


The end result? Sordid pacts with fringe radicals and another crappy coalition.


Before 2010 the last hung parliament was 1974. In the current state I cant see that changing anytime soon.


It doesn't really make you want to go running to the polls on voting day does it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Excited about the General Election?

>

> No? Never has politics been this depressing. The

> Lib Dems are arguably in a worse state after

> playing second fiddle in the coalition. The tories

> are now so middle they've lost voters in droves to

> UKIP. And Labour are lost and don't have a leader

> with charisma and backbone to make any gains.

> Worse, they'll be obliterated in Scotland this

> time round.

>

> The end result? Sordid pacts with fringe radicals

> and another crappy coalition.

>

> Before 2010 the last hung parliament was 1974. In

> the current state I cant see that changing anytime

> soon.

>

> It doesn't really make you want to go running to

> the polls on voting day does it?


I'd have said UKIP are fallingback,Lib Dems broke promises

so are paying.


It's back to two parties ... except for the Scottish - and

there's an argument thats the fault of Scottish Labour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lib Dems didn't really break any promises though. They said "if the Lib Dems are in charge, we'll do this", but the Lib Dems have never been in charge. They've probably managed to influence a bit from within, which is good.


Don't get me wrong, they'll get smashed in the GE, and I think the coalition was more to do with Clegg's ego than anything else, but I don't really think it's fait to say they broke promises, as they have never been in a position to keep them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scottish Labour = disaster


Labour had a hard core of support in Scotland since the early 1900's. A lot of that tradition's hardcore came from industry, Clyde ship building, mining etc - but that generation is now almost gone....and post referendum the SNP have snaffled all of the young majority vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't watch the polls, watch the betting shops.


My ?50 bet on a Cameron led govt post election went on at 6/1. Now at 4/7.


Odds on a Conservative majority (326 - 350 seats) now at 5/1, for Labour majority (326-350 seats) now 14/1.


Mark you odds on another coalition are around 3/1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FraddsMan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> My ?50 bet on a Cameron led govt post election went on at 6/1. Now at 4/7.


That's partly because, in the event that neither Tories or Labour get a full majority or can form a coalition, convention says that Cameron gets first dibs at forming a government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In most poll of polls the tories have edged ahead by a point or two these past few weeks. The test comes over the coming day with reaction to the budget (if any). I was always under the impression the largest party had first go at forming a government, and based on current figures that will still be the tories by an average 15/20 seats.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In most poll of polls the tories have edged ahead

> by a point or two these past few weeks. The test

> comes over the coming day with reaction to the

> budget (if any). I was always under the impression

> the largest party had first go at forming a

> government, and based on current figures that will

> still be the tories by an average 15/20 seats.

>

> Louisa.


I'd think both 'sides' will be forming 'proto' governments.


Any no confidence vote will come very quickly.


Don't know if that would mean Cameron resigns as PM and Leader of the Tories ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I predict no government will be formed.

>

> Like Belgium, we'll carry on for a year and

> perform much better with no government than with

> one.


and then get a taste for it :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be surprised if UKIP end up with more than 5 seats which would make them pretty much irrelevant. I'm beginning to think that the maths make another Tory-Lib Dem coalition the most likely outcome, albeit it would probably split the Lib Dems.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you reckon there will even be enough non disgraced kippers left to even stand for 5 seats by May ?


What does concern me is the libdem scum - they have killed themselves for a generation- their fault, they should pay, no sympathy- but the diretion of previous libdem voters ( long terms or swingers) is pivotal


of course they could go for a non event like the greens- the last time a slab of voters went green, we found ourselves invading most of the middle east as a result.


hmmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...